BR100 Increased By (0.64%)
BR30 Increased By (0.68%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.54%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.62%)
AGHA 8.00 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.38%)
BECO 5.42 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.18%)
BML 65.61 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.18%)
BOP 36.10 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.39%)
CNERGY 9.69 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.09%)
CSIL 5.95 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
FCCL 55.88 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.74%)
FFL 17.58 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.57%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
KEL 8.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.02%)
KOSM 6.13 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.32%)
LOTCHEM 31.46 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (3.38%)
MLCF 104.24 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (1.43%)
NBP 210.57 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (0.43%)
NCPL 60.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.23%)
NPL 68.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.52%)
OGDC 334.13 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.17%)
PACE 11.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.37%)
PAEL 45.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.09%)
PIBTL 17.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.28%)
PPL 236.55 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (0.39%)
PRL 42.07 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.53%)
PTC 70.99 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.21%)
SSGC 30.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.77%)
TBL 10.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.28%)
TELE 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.89%)
TPL 17.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.02%)
TPLP 12.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.39%)
TREET 24.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.28%)
TRG 65.58 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.63%)

ISLAMABAD: The apex court will announce its judgement on petitions against the Supreme Court (Review of Judgment and Order) Act, 2023, Friday (Aug 11).

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar on June 19 after hearing the arguments of Attorney General for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan and the petitioners’ counsels had reserved the verdict.

“We will announce the verdict after discussing it among ourselves,” the CJP had stated in the last hearing.

The attorney general had told the bench that Article 188 of the Constitution — which states that the SC has the power to review any judgment pronounced or any order made by it — did not limit the scope of a review.

He said; “Extending the scope of review in cases pertaining to Article 184(3) is not discriminatory because the appeals were filed before the apex court against the judgment/order of the high courts or tribunals, while the cases under Article 184(3) are heard under original jurisdiction.”

Three constitutional petitions were filed challenging the vires of the Supreme Court (Review Judgments and Orders) Act, 2023. The petitioners’ counsels contended that the enlargement of the review jurisdiction is to the ambit of appellate jurisdiction under the provisions of Entry 55 of the Federal Legislative List.

They contended that the conferment of the appellate power in the review tantamount to enlarging the review jurisdiction. Such enlargement is not envisaged in Article 185 of the constitution, therefore, the constitution amendment is necessary with respect of the Review Act that purportedly has the same effect as Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023, which is already under challenged and suspended by this Court on April 13.

An eight-member bench of SC on April 13 suspended the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 and declared; “The moment Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill, 2023 receives the assent of the President or it is deemed that such assent has been given, then from that very moment onwards and till further orders, the Act that comes into being shall not have, take or be given any effect nor be acted upon in any manner.”

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.