AIRLINK 72.59 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (4.9%)
BOP 4.99 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.84%)
CNERGY 4.29 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.7%)
DFML 31.71 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.47%)
DGKC 80.90 Increased By ▲ 3.65 (4.72%)
FCCL 21.42 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (7.1%)
FFBL 35.19 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.54%)
FFL 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.3%)
GGL 9.82 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
HBL 112.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.32%)
HUBC 136.50 Increased By ▲ 3.46 (2.6%)
HUMNL 7.14 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.73%)
KEL 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.84%)
KOSM 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.35%)
MLCF 37.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (2.92%)
OGDC 137.75 Increased By ▲ 4.88 (3.67%)
PAEL 23.41 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (3.4%)
PIAA 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.45%)
PIBTL 6.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.63%)
PPL 125.05 Increased By ▲ 8.75 (7.52%)
PRL 26.99 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.21%)
PTC 13.32 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.83%)
SEARL 52.70 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.80 Increased By ▲ 3.20 (4.73%)
SSGC 10.54 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.6%)
TPLP 10.95 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.39%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.21%)
UNITY 25.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,566 Increased By 157.7 (2.13%)
BR30 24,786 Increased By 749.4 (3.12%)
KSE100 71,902 Increased By 1235.2 (1.75%)
KSE30 23,595 Increased By 371 (1.6%)

LAHORE: Audit wing officials of the sales tax department are allegedly misusing the concept of sister companies while objecting to input sales tax adjustment claims between suppliers and buyers.

According to the sources, the department pays no heed to establish relationship of sister companies before holding them responsible for securing input sales tax adjustment on the basis of manipulated and unverified invoices.

They said the tax officials do not substantiate their stance on definite findings on the crucial allegation with regard to the relationship as sister companies between taxpayers and the whole exercise, in most of the cases, is based upon mere observation that the invoices are not authenticated by proper sales tax office.

It may be noted that the law desires the establishment of the fact that the taxpayers are either sister companies or a subsidiary of the other but no tangible evidence is produced while challenging the transactions by the audit officials.

The relevant record includes obtaining evidence from the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) in relation to the incorporation and substratum of both companies. Also, there should be a clear cut verification of holding company of the alleged subsidiary company.

Since the department is found least bothered about establishing the relationship and producing relevant evidence, therefore, the relevant appellate forums reject their notices, claiming that taxpayers are either a subsidiary or a holding company of each other in the absence of any material on record or concrete evidence produced by the department to substantiate the principle ground of sister concern relationship.

The sources said a company is deemed to be a subsidiary company of another, i.e., the holding company, if the latter holds a majority of its voting rights and a member of it besides having the right to appoint or remove a majority of board of directors. Similarly, they added, a company is also deemed to be a subsidiary company of another if it qualifies as a subsidiary of a subsidiary of a holding company.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.