AGL 22.94 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (4.13%)
AIRLINK 111.29 Increased By ▲ 6.49 (6.19%)
BOP 5.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.57%)
CNERGY 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.27%)
DCL 7.99 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.77%)
DFML 40.27 Increased By ▲ 3.87 (10.63%)
DGKC 88.00 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.09%)
FCCL 21.99 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.05%)
FFBL 42.20 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (3.03%)
FFL 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.16%)
HUBC 153.29 Increased By ▲ 3.04 (2.02%)
HUMNL 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.36%)
KEL 4.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.12%)
KOSM 3.85 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.58%)
MLCF 36.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.27%)
NBP 47.99 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.13%)
OGDC 131.80 Increased By ▲ 2.10 (1.62%)
PAEL 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.28%)
PIBTL 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.84%)
PPL 115.50 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (1.01%)
PRL 22.60 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 12.58 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.48%)
SEARL 55.69 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (2.75%)
TELE 7.20 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.41%)
TOMCL 37.00 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (3.06%)
TPLP 7.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-3.68%)
TREET 15.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.29%)
TRG 54.55 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (1%)
UNITY 31.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.44%)
WTL 1.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.68%)
BR100 8,343 Increased By 52.7 (0.64%)
BR30 26,335 Increased By 323.4 (1.24%)
KSE100 78,987 Increased By 447.9 (0.57%)
KSE30 25,365 Increased By 156.8 (0.62%)

Administrations/researchers in the West have been accusing China of being an unforgiving lender to developing countries (defined as not open to negotiations of deferral/rescheduling, a charge made more acute after the country launched its One Belt One Road initiative in 2013, a global infrastructure development strategy), non-transparent (defined as not sharing the actual amount of debt to any one country, the applicable interest rate and date of return with international donors and bilaterals) while supporting controversial projects in conjunction with the debtor government’s political leadership.

A 2023 study by AidData, the World Bank, the Harvard Kennedy School, and the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, pointed out that Beijing has considerably raised its emergency rescue lending to countries in financial distress or outright default.

However, low income countries, representing only 20 percent of all Chinese lending, are offered a debt restructuring plan that includes repayment extension but no new money while middle income countries, recipients of 80 percent of all Chinese lending, get new money through balance of payments support, with the objective of deferring default.

And this support, such is the conclusion of the researchers, is to ensure that China’s largest overseas borrowers remain liquid enough to service their outstanding OBOR projects.

“Beijing is ultimately trying to rescue its own banks. That’s why it has gotten into the risky business of international bailout lending,” so maintains Carmen Reinhart, one of the study’s authors, adding that “if you are going to bail out a borrower that is in default or teetering on the edge of default, it’s important to have a clear understanding of whether you are trying to solve a short term liquidity problem or a long term solvency problem.”

China refuted these allegations of an unforgiving lender and echoed previous statements maintaining that if it is to accede to IMF and World Bank demands to forgive a portion of its loans, so should those multilateral lenders, which it views as U.S. proxies. “We call on these institutions to actively participate in relevant actions in accordance with the principle of ‘joint action, fair burden’ and make greater contributions to help developing countries tide over the difficulties,” the Ministry statement said.

Pakistan, with very low foreign exchange reserves, 4193 million dollars on 19 May 2023 (less than two months of imports) and very weak sovereign rating (post October 2022 downgraded to almost junk status by the three major international rating agencies) has been the recipient of Chinese bail-out funds - just one out of 22 countries that have received bailout funds from China, a list which includes Turkey, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, Venezuela, Argentina, Belarus, Egypt and Ecuador.

So how much does Pakistan owe China? According to the Economic Survey 2021-22 public and publicly guaranteed debt outstanding as of 31 March 2022 from China is 14.5 billion dollars – thrice its IMF debt of 7.8 billion dollars, and exceeding the borrowings from World Bank and Asian Development Bank.

There is no further clarity as to the total amount owed to China by Pakistan in data uploaded on Pakistan government websites but a report uploaded on the website of the International Monetary Fund (September 2022) maintains that China and Chinese commercial banks hold about 30 percent of Pakistan’s total external debt of about 126 billion dollars with the bulk of this debt accruing under China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects.

Bloomberg contends that at the end of last fiscal year Pakistan’s outstanding bilateral debt to the Paris Club countries was about 10 billion dollars while it owed 23 billion dollars to China out of which around 10 billion dollars was owed to “commercial banks” (defined as state-owned Chinese lenders operating as official financing arms for China’s Belt and Road Initiative).

Between July 2021 and March 2022, over 80 percent of Pakistan’s bilateral debt service went to Beijing. The news agency adds that: (i) as per Economic Survey China’s SAFE (State Administration of Foreign Exchange) lent 7 billion dollars to Pakistan which is not clarified in the budget; and (ii) 8.77 billion dollars is owed to three Chinese state- owned lenders notably Bank of China, ICBC and China Development Bank who between 2016-17 and 2020-21 extended short-term loans of 11.48 billion dollars though how much is still outstanding is unclear.

There is empirical evidence that Chinese investment under CPEC umbrella did fuel growth during the PML-N tenure (2013-18) culminating in 5.8 percent in 2018; however, it exacerbated imbalance in the economy by a rise in imports (machinery and material for the IPPs) while exports lagged resulting in a balance of payments crisis that led to the 2019 IMF programme loan.

Recent reports indicate that the Chinese Charge d’Affaires met with Tariq Fatemi, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Coordination, and conveyed concerns that overdue receivables to Chinese power companies (established under CPEC, an arm of OBOR) have reached 1.5 billion dollars and the amount is accumulating with time with the Power Division seeking 700 billion rupees (2.45 billion dollars at the interbank rate of 285.45 as on Thursday this week past) in next year’s budget to clear overdue payments under CPEC projects.

The Pakistani government has suggested that the dues maybe offset by China purchasing surplus power for Afghanistan though the extent of Chinese engagement with the Afghan Taliban has waned considerably in recent months. The 2023 study also notes that China increasingly requires cash be put into “a hidden escrow account” that would lead to China being at the top of the queue of creditors to be paid.

Chinese IPPs in Pakistan have reportedly refused to renegotiate the contracts signed during the previous PML-N tenure - a process that began during the Khan administration with assistance from the premier spy agency but while non-CPEC IPPs agreed to the new terms that favoured the country and our consumers the CPEC IPPS refused to re-negotiate - by arguing that this may lead other countries to seek similar concessions. The CPEC IPPs further insisted that the sanctity of the contracts signed must be upheld.

In this context it is relevant to note two disturbing ground realities: (i) Sinosure (the Chinese insurance company without whose approval no Chinese company can invest) is no longer approving any new projects in Pakistan due to failure to meet contractual obligations; and (ii) Pakistan set up a 50 billion-rupee escrow account in November 2022 for automatic partial payments to Chinese IPPs no doubt to pacify Sinosure.

Be that as it may, given the severe and an almost daily worsening macroeconomic impasse in the country today, with limited fiscal space and rising demands from the recipients of current expenditure one would assume that the current economic team leaders’ only pro-growth strategy for budget 2023-24 is likely to be through an expansion of CPEC projects.

So where does Pakistan stand today? Foreign exchange reserves are disturbingly low that account for the government continuing severe administrative measures to curtail private sector imports and limiting critical imports by state entities (fuel and essential food items) thereby creating hardship for the general public as well as compromising the capacity of Independent Power Producers (IPPs) including those operating under the umbrella of CPEC to import fuel or repatriate profits.

Failure to reach a staff level agreement with the Fund on the ninth review has created a rather difficult situation for Pakistan and China, our long term strategic partner: heavier than ever reliance on China for bailout (roll overs and new loans), reliance on expanding the scope of CPEC to fuel domestic growth as foreign direct and domestic investment continue to shrivel while China is insisting that Pakistan follows the Fund prescriptions as a way to resolve its problems due to flawed policy decisions which sadly continue and include passing on the onus of poor performing sectors onto the hapless consumers through ever rising utility rates, taxing the already taxed while resisting attempts to widen the tax net for political reasons and raising current expenditure, a highly inflationary policy, to sustain the elite capture of government expenditure.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.

Johnny Jun 05, 2023 06:06am
Chine should have offered low interest rate loans or grants for CPEC projects! And no hush money for the wheelers and deelers!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tulukan Mairandi Jun 05, 2023 09:04am
China is the worlds top economic predator. Their loans to us had an average 18% interest rate
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Awami Jun 05, 2023 09:41am
It is not fault of China, they are giving loan . The problem is loan is in dollars ( not in rupees ). The income from built roads, power plants is in rupees. It is mistake to take loan in dollars, it should be taken in Rupees , so there is equivalence in returning. Now return is very costly as US Dollar will be appreciating over years. It was not tactical mistake ( it can be corrected ) , blunder means it is strategic mistake for ever.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Awami Jun 05, 2023 09:45am
@Johnny, ....Loan should be taken in local currency (Rupee). Even if loan is interest free, it is in dollars, rupee depreciates very steeply, it is unaffordable.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Awami Jun 05, 2023 09:53am
@Tulukan Mairandi, Sir China is lender , the loan is in dollars , the roads , port city and power plants etc. built by loans produce fees, power charges in rupees. You can look at graph how rupee is on steep slide. larger neighbor when borrowing externally has mostly Rupee loans even from foreign countries. It is not wise take loans in US dollars and produce product which brings local currency , it is looser strategic blunder.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Haris Fahim Jun 05, 2023 10:34am
Unless Pakistani street doesn't rise up against Elite capture and corrupt political mafia including "bureaucracy", no good's coming our way.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Tulukan Mairandi Jun 05, 2023 10:41am
Why can't iron brother China, with trillions of dollars in forex reserves, help loan Pakistan just $10 billion with nominal 4% interest rate, if their intentions are good? They won't. They want Pakistan to forever be hooked and dependent like opium addicts so that we will forever be like their female dog on a leash.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Jun 05, 2023 11:39am
We are still dancing around the main problem, the loans and repayments are a reality but how much of these loans bleed through corrupt practices is the real issue that no one is willing to talk about. From commissions to omissions of payment and completion guarantees, the projects have uncertain futures, especially when they are linked to changing governments. Observations based on data may be good for analysis but data on ground reality is mindboggling.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
John Jun 05, 2023 02:05pm
@Johnny, Chinese contrary to their claims to be an iron brother, in reality, put their own interest first, the fall of East Pakistan is a prime example!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Ash Chak Jun 05, 2023 08:02pm
@Awami, and what will Pakistan buy with the rupees? Everything that Pakistan needs has to be bought with US Dollars. India is taking advantage of Russia and is paying for oil with Indian Rupees. But Russia cannot buy anything with these Rupees and the money is just accumulating.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Sajida Wasim Jun 06, 2023 06:32pm
As of December 2022, Pakistan holds external debt and liabilities of $126.3 billion. Nearly 77% of this debt, amounting to $97.5 billion is directly owed by the government of Pakistan to various creditors; an additional $7.9 billion is owed by government-controlled public sector enterprises to multilateral creditors. .. Pakistan’s large external debt comes with considerable repayment pressure. From April 2023 to June 2026, Pakistan needs to repay $77.5 billion in external debt. For a $350 billion economy, this is a hefty burden. The major repayments in the next three years are to Chinese financial institutions, private creditors and Saudi Arabia. https://www.usip.org/publications/2023/04/pakistans-existential-economic-crisis
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Shahid Jun 06, 2023 07:07pm
@John, Very true...in December 1971...like the US 7th fleet...the promised Chinese intervention never came!
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Awami Jun 08, 2023 10:21am
@Shahid, not rational expectations lead to mistakes which can not be corrected, called blunders.
thumb_up Recommended (0)