BAFL 45.31 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.14%)
BIPL 20.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-3.48%)
BOP 5.61 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (6.25%)
CNERGY 4.60 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (4.07%)
DFML 15.82 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
DGKC 73.45 Increased By ▲ 2.14 (3%)
FABL 27.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-1.73%)
FCCL 16.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.79%)
FFL 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.63%)
GGL 12.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-3.57%)
HBL 111.18 Decreased By ▼ -2.22 (-1.96%)
HUBC 119.71 Decreased By ▼ -2.19 (-1.8%)
HUMNL 7.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-7.18%)
KEL 3.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-3.56%)
LOTCHEM 27.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.68%)
MLCF 39.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.74%)
OGDC 108.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-1.07%)
PAEL 17.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-3.28%)
PIBTL 5.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.31%)
PIOC 106.48 Decreased By ▼ -3.52 (-3.2%)
PPL 92.12 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-1.59%)
PRL 25.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.56%)
SILK 1.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-3.77%)
SNGP 63.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.61%)
SSGC 11.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.35%)
TELE 8.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-6.19%)
TPLP 13.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-5.18%)
TRG 84.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-1.22%)
UNITY 25.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.8%)
WTL 1.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-4.38%)
BR100 6,185 Decreased By -45.4 (-0.73%)
BR30 21,452 Decreased By -287.1 (-1.32%)
KSE100 60,502 Decreased By -228.3 (-0.38%)
KSE30 20,175 Decreased By -64.2 (-0.32%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court will resume hearing of the Election Commission of Pakistan’s review petition against its April 4 order on May 23.

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar, on May 15, had issued notices to the respondents, Attorney General for Pakistan and the Advocate Generals of the Punjab and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP).

The deadline fixed by the bench for general elections in the Punjab and KP has already expired on May 14. The same bench has also disposed of the petition seeking same day elections across the country.

The federal government has not provided the funds and security personnel to the Commission, and have also not filed the review petition. The chief justice twice during the same day elections noted that no one has challenged their order to hold elections in the Punjab on May 14.

The ECP in its review petition, filed on May 3, contended that the framers of the Constitution have given the judicial institution a pivotal role in safeguarding and preserving the Constitution, but have at the same defined the ambit and scope of judicial intervention under sub-article 2 of the Article 175 of the Constitution.

The Commission has asked the Court to recall its impugned judgment dated 04.04.2023, in the interest of justice and equity.

It said that the superior courts of the country have been granted a special power under Article 199 and Article 184 (3) of the Constitution to judicially review actions/ decisions of the public bodies. As per trite law of this land, while exercising the power of judicial review, superior courts look at the process of arriving at a decision but never substitute their own decisions in lieu of the public bodies.

This division of power between different organs, popularly known as trichotomy of powers, is the hallmark of the Constitution and essential sine qua non for smooth and efficient functioning of the country. This well-embedded constitutional concept isolates the three organs from interfering and treading into the domain of the other.

The judicial institution has been conferred the power to judicially review the actions and decision of the executive while at the same time being restrained from exercising the executive authority itself.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023


Comments are closed.

KU May 20, 2023 11:30am
''Trichotomy of powers, the hallmark of the Constitution and essential sine qua non'', but this depends on when state pillars remain moral and ethical. Besides, if there is a strong perception by the citizens and political parties that state institutions are biased in their judgments or decisions, courts are the logical course for the relief of grievances. Our leaders are wasting precious time and resources on matters that do not benefit the economy and welfare of people, and every citizen understands that their future is bleak. An example of foreign funding case against PTI is in court but a similar subject case against other parties is not pursued. Other cases and inquiries since 2007 on corruption and money laundering have gone through many shades of legal transitions and are now been concluded with zero punishment or jail time. It's sad but any thoughts on a bright future or economic development without justice are at best utopian.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Parvez May 20, 2023 06:45pm
Does the SC still exist ?
thumb_up Recommended (0)

ECP’s review plea: SC to resume hearing on 23rd

KSE-100 snaps 7-session rally as profit-taking kicks in

IHC acquits Nawaz Sharif in Avenfield reference

Imran Khan will not take part in intra-party polls, PTI announces

Inter-bank: rupee registers back-to-back gains against US dollar

Open market: rupee unchanged against US dollar

Caretaker PM meets Kuwait’s First Deputy Prime Minister

UAE’s Jaber rejects report on seeking hydrocarbon deals in COP28 meetings

TPL Life Insurance, Dar Es Salam Textile Mills move ahead with merger talks

Indian govt official directed Sikh separatist’s assassination plot in US, DOJ says

Israel, Hamas due to release more people amid efforts to extend truce