BAFL 53.19 Increased By ▲ 3.16 (6.32%)
BIPL 22.90 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (2.19%)
BOP 5.67 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (4.61%)
CNERGY 5.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.39%)
DFML 19.35 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.89%)
DGKC 80.54 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.49%)
FABL 33.11 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.79%)
FCCL 20.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 10.48 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (8.6%)
GGL 13.61 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
HBL 129.52 Increased By ▲ 8.18 (6.74%)
HUBC 123.38 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (0.72%)
HUMNL 8.04 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.5%)
KEL 4.43 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (11.59%)
LOTCHEM 28.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.25%)
MLCF 42.71 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.21%)
OGDC 125.38 Increased By ▲ 4.05 (3.34%)
PAEL 21.33 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (5.44%)
PIBTL 6.11 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (5.34%)
PIOC 118.47 Increased By ▲ 2.57 (2.22%)
PPL 113.85 Increased By ▲ 3.10 (2.8%)
PRL 31.80 Increased By ▲ 2.22 (7.51%)
SILK 1.10 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.85%)
SNGP 69.44 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.59%)
SSGC 13.76 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.44%)
TELE 9.16 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (4.69%)
TPLP 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.82%)
TRG 92.45 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (1.26%)
UNITY 27.47 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.81%)
WTL 1.67 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (2.45%)
BR100 6,815 Increased By 167.1 (2.51%)
BR30 24,245 Increased By 677 (2.87%)
KSE100 66,224 Increased By 1505.6 (2.33%)
KSE30 22,123 Increased By 529.1 (2.45%)

ISLAMABAD: Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has ruled that the oil & gas sector being a highly regulated segment of national economy is strictly governed by the designated regulator, i.e., Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra).

On the issue of compensation on delayed refund to an importer and seller of the liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), the FTO’s new order said that the preliminary objection regarding the bar of jurisdiction raised under Section 9 (2) (a) of the FTC Ordinance has been examined and observed that Oil & Gas sector being a highly regulated segment of national economy is strictly governed by the Ogra. All activities in this sensitive sector are properly regulated, licensed and monitored by the Ogra.

Under section 9(2) (a) of FTO Ordinance, 2000 no further investigation is mandated. Case files assigned to record, FTO order said.

The said complaint has been filed in terms of Section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO Ordinance) against non-issuance of appeal effect order in compliance to ATIR decision and subsequent issuance of income tax refund and additional compensation.

Briefly, the complainant is an AOP engaged in the business of import and sale of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The complainant e-filed Return of Income for Tax Year 2016 along with refund application on 08.11.2016 claiming refund at Rs 271,430,856/- based on deductions under Section 148 of the Income Tax Ordinance (the Ordinance) as adjustable. The Additional Commissioner-IR (ADCIR) amended the deemed assessment order under Section 122(5A) of the Ordinance, holding the complainant as commercial importer (FTR) and not manufacturer vide order dated 03.03.2017.

Ogra asked to examine demand for furnace oil by power sector, industry

The complaint was referred to the Secretary, Revenue Division for comments, in terms of Section 10(4) of the FTO Ordinance read with Section 9(1) of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013. In response thereto, the Chief Commissioner-IR, LTO Karachi vide letters dated 12.10.2022 & 21.10.2022 forwarded comments of Commissioner Audit-Ill and Commissioner Enforcement-I, LTO Karachi.

The Commissioner Audit-Ill vide letter dated 10.10.2022 submitted that appeal effect order under section 124 of the Ordinance in compliance to decision of ATIR dated 13.12.2017 had already been given, determining income tax refund of Rs. 270,511,998 vide order dated 10.10.2022.

On the other hand, the Commissioner Enforcement-I raised objection against issuance of refund contending that the legal issue whether complainant was a manufacturer or commercial importer had been pending before Sindh High Court (SHC). In addition, the Deptt challenged the order of ATIR dated 13.12.2017 before SHC vide ITRA no. 77/2018 which is still pending. Hence, the issue being subjudice is barred on the point of jurisdiction under Section 9(2) (b) of the FTC Ordinance.

However, it was concluded that since the matter of treating income tax collected on import stage as adjustable or final tax is sub-judice before the Sindh High Court; hence, any refund application filed by the complainant will be processed as per law upon final decision of the High Court of Sindh.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022


Comments are closed.

FTO says oil, gas sector ‘strictly’ governed by Ogra

Yemen rebels threaten Israel-bound Red Sea ships

Policeman martyred, two injured in blast in Balochistan’s Khuzdar

North Korea condemns US veto of Gaza ceasefire call at UN

Govt seeks to cure Sino-Pak trade imbalance

Independent directors’ selection: SECP directs cos to exercise due diligence

700.7MW hydel power project: Chinese co urges PPIB to grant extension in financial close

SIFC panel for single authority to manage all SEZs

IMF scheduled to consider first review of $3bn SBA on Jan 11

Gaza war puts entire generation at risk of 'radicalisation': Qatar PM

Police force needs to improve its image: PM