AVN 65.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-1.3%)
BAFL 30.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 4.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.11%)
CNERGY 3.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.99%)
DFML 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-4.26%)
DGKC 42.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.54 (-3.52%)
EPCL 46.13 Increased By ▲ 1.48 (3.31%)
FCCL 11.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-3.21%)
FFL 5.19 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (4.43%)
FLYNG 5.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-4.59%)
GGL 10.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-3.28%)
HUBC 63.21 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.46%)
HUMNL 5.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.05%)
KAPCO 27.81 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.94%)
KEL 2.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-2.71%)
LOTCHEM 25.37 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-4.62%)
MLCF 21.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-3.86%)
NETSOL 84.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-1.45%)
OGDC 86.64 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.43%)
PAEL 10.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.75%)
PIBTL 4.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.64%)
PPL 78.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.43 (-1.79%)
PRL 13.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.37%)
SILK 0.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-2.22%)
SNGP 41.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.8%)
TELE 6.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.22%)
TPLP 16.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.54%)
TRG 111.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-0.59%)
UNITY 14.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.37%)
WTL 1.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-5%)
BR100 4,026 Decreased By -48.6 (-1.19%)
BR30 14,402 Decreased By -123 (-0.85%)
KSE100 40,451 Decreased By -396 (-0.97%)
KSE30 15,110 Decreased By -101.7 (-0.67%)
Follow us

ISLAMABAD: Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has ruled that the oil & gas sector being a highly regulated segment of national economy is strictly governed by the designated regulator, i.e., Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra).

On the issue of compensation on delayed refund to an importer and seller of the liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), the FTO’s new order said that the preliminary objection regarding the bar of jurisdiction raised under Section 9 (2) (a) of the FTC Ordinance has been examined and observed that Oil & Gas sector being a highly regulated segment of national economy is strictly governed by the Ogra. All activities in this sensitive sector are properly regulated, licensed and monitored by the Ogra.

Under section 9(2) (a) of FTO Ordinance, 2000 no further investigation is mandated. Case files assigned to record, FTO order said.

The said complaint has been filed in terms of Section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO Ordinance) against non-issuance of appeal effect order in compliance to ATIR decision and subsequent issuance of income tax refund and additional compensation.

Briefly, the complainant is an AOP engaged in the business of import and sale of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The complainant e-filed Return of Income for Tax Year 2016 along with refund application on 08.11.2016 claiming refund at Rs 271,430,856/- based on deductions under Section 148 of the Income Tax Ordinance (the Ordinance) as adjustable. The Additional Commissioner-IR (ADCIR) amended the deemed assessment order under Section 122(5A) of the Ordinance, holding the complainant as commercial importer (FTR) and not manufacturer vide order dated 03.03.2017.

Ogra asked to examine demand for furnace oil by power sector, industry

The complaint was referred to the Secretary, Revenue Division for comments, in terms of Section 10(4) of the FTO Ordinance read with Section 9(1) of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act, 2013. In response thereto, the Chief Commissioner-IR, LTO Karachi vide letters dated 12.10.2022 & 21.10.2022 forwarded comments of Commissioner Audit-Ill and Commissioner Enforcement-I, LTO Karachi.

The Commissioner Audit-Ill vide letter dated 10.10.2022 submitted that appeal effect order under section 124 of the Ordinance in compliance to decision of ATIR dated 13.12.2017 had already been given, determining income tax refund of Rs. 270,511,998 vide order dated 10.10.2022.

On the other hand, the Commissioner Enforcement-I raised objection against issuance of refund contending that the legal issue whether complainant was a manufacturer or commercial importer had been pending before Sindh High Court (SHC). In addition, the Deptt challenged the order of ATIR dated 13.12.2017 before SHC vide ITRA no. 77/2018 which is still pending. Hence, the issue being subjudice is barred on the point of jurisdiction under Section 9(2) (b) of the FTC Ordinance.

However, it was concluded that since the matter of treating income tax collected on import stage as adjustable or final tax is sub-judice before the Sindh High Court; hence, any refund application filed by the complainant will be processed as per law upon final decision of the High Court of Sindh.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

FTO says oil, gas sector ‘strictly’ governed by Ogra

Imran Khan to contest by-elections on all 33 NA seats: Qureshi

Ishaq Dar announces 35-rupee hike in prices of petrol and diesel

FM Bilawal arrives in Moscow on two-day official visit

India's Adani Group: Hindenburg report intended to create false market

Gulf stocks rise on hope of slower Fed rate hikes

At least 41 killed as passenger coach falls into ravine in Lasbela

6.3 magnitude earthquake jolts Islamabad, surrounding areas

Ten children killed in northwest Pakistan boat capsize

Blinken arrives in Egypt as Middle East violence erupts

Former UN chief calls for climate action over ‘visions’ at COP28