AGL 5.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.73%)
ANL 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
AVN 76.00 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.26%)
BOP 5.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.34%)
CNERGY 4.43 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
EFERT 82.20 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (0.7%)
EPCL 49.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.42%)
FCCL 12.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.64%)
FFL 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.82%)
FLYNG 6.79 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.89%)
FNEL 4.76 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.28%)
GGGL 9.18 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (9.03%)
GGL 14.88 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (6.67%)
HUMNL 6.15 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.15%)
KEL 2.57 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.39%)
LOTCHEM 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.54%)
MLCF 23.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.01%)
OGDC 73.00 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.67%)
PAEL 15.20 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.13%)
PIBTL 4.90 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 15.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.56%)
SILK 1.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.73%)
TELE 8.90 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.91%)
TPL 7.22 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.98%)
TPLP 19.50 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.25%)
TREET 20.90 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.24%)
TRG 137.39 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (0.58%)
UNITY 16.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.85%)
WAVES 9.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.54%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (2.96%)
BR100 4,168 Increased By 10.4 (0.25%)
BR30 15,434 Increased By 95.1 (0.62%)
KSE100 41,707 Increased By 55.4 (0.13%)
KSE30 15,425 Increased By 44.9 (0.29%)
Follow us

ISLAMABAD: In a landmark judgement, Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR) Islamabad has directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to immediately refund the amount of Rs88 million illegally recovered from a taxpayers’ bank account and investigate the conduct of the involved officials.

In this regard, the ATIR Islamabad has issued a detailed judgement against the relevant officials of the FBR.

The tribunal cannot be a silent spectator in this case where the revenue officer misused his power and made an unlawful recovery and acted against the judicial conscience. The coercive action against the recovery of disputed tax demand cannot be restored unless the case has been decided by the tribunal, which is an independent forum, the ATIR order stated. The ATIR has referred a case of highhandedness, by Chief Commissioner, Commissioner and Deputy-Commissioner Inland Revenue of Corporate Tax Office Islamabad for recovery of funds through bank account attachment, to Registrar Islamabad High Court (IHC) for initiating contempt of court proceedings.

According to the judgement of the ATIR, the ATIR has referred the matter to the chairman FBR to look into the conduct of officers including CCIR; CIR (Enforcement) and DCIR, within the purview of Section 7 of the FBR Act, 2007 and the directions that chairman FBR shall pass a speaking order within a period of 30 days, under intimation to the Registrar, ATIR, Islamabad and a copy of the order has also been delivered to the Registrar (Judicial), IHC, with a reference that the IHC may be graciously pleased to deal with the question of contempt proceedings within the meaning of Section 3 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 against the FBR officers.

When contacted Lahore-based tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt told this correspondence that earlier former FTO Mushtaq Sukhera has ordered recovery from personal salaries of two FBR officers in a case of unlawful recovery through bank attachment of a taxpayer. In most cases recovery moves show administrative excesses for improper motives and inefficiency in the discharge of duties and responsibility and as a consequence unlawful recovery of funds through snatching of bank accounts of innocent taxpayers of Pakistan by the FBR field formations to show performance.

Butt added that earlier former FTO (not belonging to FBR) has held that non-compliance of appellate order, disobeying and disregarding it, by the assessing officer is tantamount to indiscipline, insubordination, and maladministration, making the officer liable to suitable disciplinary action but all in vain FBR is least interested to follow the law in the tenure of present FTO (belonging to FBR), the tax lawyer added.

The ATIR order states “The relevant facts, in this case, are that the appeals were pending before this Tribunal. Stay against recovery of tax, granted earlier, was extended for 30 days. Before the expiry of the 30-day stay, the Applicant vigilantly moved another Stay, which was taken up by on 22.09.2022 (Thursday). Since the stay granted earlier through the Previous Stay Extension Order had not lapsed, this Tribunal adjourned the case in the presence of the parties and fixed applications for 26.09.2022 (Monday), which was the first working day after the expiry of the Previous Stay Order.

On 26.09.2022 this Tribunal again extended the stay for 40 days. The department was well aware of the forgoing facts, despite this, the assessing officer issued the notice dated 26.09.2022 u/s 140 to the Banks, attaching the bank accounts and requiring them to pay a sum of Rs168,575,684. The banks complied with the direction of the Recovery Officer (RO). All this happened on the same day on 26.09.2022 in the presence of the stay order/application for extension of the stay order and recovered amount from the different bank accounts of the applicant.

The RO has recovered the demand illegally because of which the power/authority of the Tribunal has been rendered nugatory. The notice, as evident from the electronic record, was served upon banks before 10:30am, and the total amount was recovered before 12pm on 26.09.2022 prior to the decision on an application for the extension of stay. Hence, the recovery proceeding and recovery had been completed by the time the stay application was taken up by Tribunal at 12:05 pm. When the application was taken up, the DR present in the Court apprised the bench that recovery proceedings had already been affected so the applicant was not entitled to interim relief.

The ATIR order states, this Tribunal has inherent powers to ensure that the taxpayer is not left high and dry only on account of illegal and highhanded actions on the part of revenue and the RO. The lower authorities are bound to obey the order passed by this Tribunal unless and until it is not reversed or suspended by the Superior Courts.

FBR vide Circular-Letter No:7(20)S(IR-Operations) 202 dated 12.10.2021 categorically asked the concerned CCIR to avoid unnecessary hazards of litigation and coercive measures for the recovery of disputed tax demands until the case has passed the test of appeal at the level of learned CIR(Appeals).After the insertion of Article 10A in the Constitution, fair trial and due process are fundamental rights of every citizen for determination of civil rights and obligations.

We are living in a democratic setup and the taxpayers deserve to be respected for their contribution to national development. Public servants are expected to discharge their functions dutifully but not unreasonably. The officers are supposed to work diligently but not harassingly, the ATIR order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

Khurram Shahzad Oct 04, 2022 02:55pm
Very good to hear.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Muslim Oct 04, 2022 04:54pm
That's nawaz-shit
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Arif Yakub Oct 04, 2022 07:01pm
In which bank the tax payer maintained the account? That's important to know.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Adnan Aziz Oct 04, 2022 07:53pm
FBR should refund all 'refundable' amounts, whether large or small. Not everyone can approach ATIR for this purpose. The Problem:- Nobody wants to pay tax in this country. FBR resorts to high-handedness to meet its targets.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Dua Shahid Oct 05, 2022 09:59pm
I think it is high-handedness on part of the appellant tribunal Inland revenue ATIR as evident from the above report by business recorder . Most of the tribunals members specially that of Islamabad are the most corrupt who even involve in malpractices in granting stay orders. Readers must thoroughly study the above report and note the timing of the events.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Imran Khan Oct 06, 2022 01:10am
Busnss Recorder is a perfect forum for FBR bashing...the language, the selected facts and one sided reporting of this articles shows insensitivity to developing perception of corruption/high handedness of FBR, which enhace taxpayer compliance risk. If the taxpayers' appeal is pending b4 ATIR, it means the legality of tax levy is confirmed by Commisioner Appeal. After 1st Appeal confirmation, the department is justified to resort to coercive recovery as per a plethora of Court's judgment. This articles smartly hides how many times ATIR Islmbd has granted stay in this case against recovery...it should have rather focused on disposing the case off expeditiously & judiciously. But no, stay order is much easier than passing the main judgment,who cares if billions are stucked at appellate fora.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Imran Khan Oct 06, 2022 01:12am
@Adnan Aziz, the recovery in this case is not about refund....and yes, no one pays tax in this country, FBR resorts to high handedness to meet its targets.
thumb_up Recommended (0)

ATIR’s landmark decision: FBR told to refund Rs88m recovered ‘illegally’

Electricity bills: PD says doesn’t want to manage tax, surcharge collection

Intra-day update: rupee registers marginal improvement against US dollar

Forex reserves fall to $6.7bn on repayments

BHC orders to quash all FIRs registered against PTI's Azam Swati

Pakistan Refinery says will shut down for 'approximately 20 days'

China’s Xi meets Arab leaders on ‘milestone’ Saudi trip

Oil bounces on pipeline shutdown, but heads for weekly loss on demand woes

CARs: ADB lists barriers to trade flows

FX reserves may rise in H2FY23: All debt repayments on track, says SBP governor

‘Country of Particular Concern’: Pakistan conveys its concerns to US