AIRLINK 72.70 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-1.89%)
BOP 5.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1%)
CNERGY 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
DFML 29.86 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.08%)
DGKC 84.60 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (1.26%)
FCCL 22.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.22%)
FFBL 34.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-1.49%)
FFL 10.21 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.44%)
GGL 10.30 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3%)
HBL 112.83 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (0.74%)
HUBC 141.00 Increased By ▲ 3.31 (2.4%)
HUMNL 8.03 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (15.04%)
KEL 4.50 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.27%)
KOSM 4.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.87%)
MLCF 38.74 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.49%)
OGDC 134.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.62 (-1.19%)
PAEL 26.67 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (6.09%)
PIAA 26.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 6.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.75%)
PPL 122.75 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-2.11%)
PRL 28.33 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.43%)
PTC 14.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.1%)
SEARL 54.93 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.6%)
SNGP 70.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.97%)
SSGC 10.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.57%)
TELE 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.94%)
TPLP 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
TRG 61.55 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (1.4%)
UNITY 25.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.51%)
WTL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.17%)
BR100 7,666 Increased By 1.3 (0.02%)
BR30 25,129 Increased By 103.3 (0.41%)
KSE100 73,134 Increased By 369.5 (0.51%)
KSE30 23,748 Decreased By -27.7 (-0.12%)
Pakistan

IHC seeks comments from respondents in case about Christian Marriage Act

  • The petitioners prayed the court to turn down the section 3 and 18 of Christian Marriage Act 1872 as these were contradicting the Articles 4,9,25 and 35 of the Constitution.
Published May 20, 2021

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday sought comments from respondents in a case related to the Christian Marriage Act 1872.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the case filed by a citizen Shahzad Francis and Sabir Michal.

During the course of proceeding, Deputy Attorney General Syed Muhammad Tayyab Shah requested the court to grant time to the federation for submission of comments. The court accepted the request and adjourned hearing of the case.

The petitioners had adopted the stance that under the Christian Marriage Act, any christian citizen couldn’t give divorce to his wife until any allegation against her was proved. The law was contradicting with international laws related to the subject.

The petitioners prayed the court to turn down the section 3 and 18 of Christian Marriage Act 1872 as these were contradicting the Articles 4,9,25 and 35 of the Constitution.

Comments

Comments are closed.