BR100 Decreased By (-0.88%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.57%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.75%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.72%)
AGHA 6.70 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
BECO 4.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 56.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-2.3%)
BOP 30.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.86%)
CNERGY 12.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.3%)
CSIL 5.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.48%)
FCCL 51.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-2.44%)
FFL 14.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.7%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (8.93%)
KEL 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.99%)
KOSM 5.86 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.27%)
LOTCHEM 26.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.98%)
MLCF 90.98 Decreased By ▼ -2.18 (-2.34%)
NBP 164.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.39%)
NCPL 53.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.36 (-4.24%)
NPL 59.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.76 (-2.88%)
OGDC 312.99 Decreased By ▼ -3.74 (-1.18%)
PACE 9.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.52%)
PAEL 35.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.93%)
PIBTL 14.71 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.2%)
PPL 221.25 Decreased By ▼ -5.66 (-2.49%)
PRL 90.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.12 (-2.28%)
PTC 58.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-2.26%)
SSGC 23.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-2.31%)
TBL 8.78 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
TELE 7.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-3.08%)
TPL 22.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.21%)
TPLP 12.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-3.55%)
TREET 21.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.76%)
TRG 55.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) has maintained the orders issued by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ATIR) and Commissioner (Appeals) against a leading cigarette manufacturing company in the income tax references.

The IHC has issued an order in the case of the cigarette manufacturing company vs Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue (ACIR).

According to the IHC order, the tobacco company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and sale of various brands of cigarettes, who filed Income Tax Return for the years 2007 to 2010, regarding which Additional Commissioner Inland Revenue issued show cause notice alleging therein that the deemed assessment order passed by the Commissioner was erroneous and subsequently amended the assessment order deemed to have been passed by the Commissioner.

The company aggrieved thereby preferred Appeals against respective Tax Year before the CIR-Appeals which were dismissed vide Order dated 2.9.11, against which Applicant approached the Learned Appellate ATIR Inland Revenue (ATIR) in Appeals, however the ATIR upheld the decision of ACIR and that of CIR-Appeals and dismissed the appeals of the company. In view of detailed discussion, both the forums have rightly answered the question in a proper manner, as such, it is settled proposition that factual aspects and disputes could not be considered in reference jurisdiction, rather only legal issue can be raised at the High Court level, especially when factual controversy has already been resolved by the ATIR. The said income tax references were answered in negative, as such, the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate as well as by lower forums were hereby maintained, the IHC order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.