AIRLINK 77.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-0.9%)
BOP 4.72 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.51%)
CNERGY 4.07 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.99%)
DFML 38.17 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (4.63%)
DGKC 90.09 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (2.08%)
FCCL 23.22 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (4.17%)
FFBL 31.83 Increased By ▲ 1.68 (5.57%)
FFL 9.27 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.98%)
GGL 10.02 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.01%)
HASCOL 6.19 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.31%)
HBL 108.25 Increased By ▲ 3.25 (3.1%)
HUBC 140.55 Increased By ▲ 3.05 (2.22%)
HUMNL 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.41%)
KEL 4.70 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.29%)
KOSM 4.11 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.75%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (1.8%)
OGDC 126.75 Increased By ▲ 7.56 (6.34%)
PAEL 24.40 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.75%)
PIBTL 6.17 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.65%)
PPL 119.10 Increased By ▲ 5.05 (4.43%)
PRL 23.75 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (2.5%)
PTC 12.45 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.05%)
SEARL 59.85 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (1.35%)
SNGP 63.72 Increased By ▲ 1.74 (2.81%)
SSGC 9.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
TELE 7.85 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.35%)
TPLP 9.75 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.85%)
TRG 63.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.27%)
UNITY 26.90 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
WTL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
BR100 7,794 Increased By 216.3 (2.85%)
BR30 24,954 Increased By 735.2 (3.04%)
KSE100 74,605 Increased By 1807.6 (2.48%)
KSE30 23,926 Increased By 712.6 (3.07%)

The Federal Tax Ombudsman, Justice Saleem Akhtar, has asked the Peshawar Collector of Sales Tax (Refund) to decide a refund claim within three weeks as no action was taken on the application for more than six months.
The complainant, Amir Rauf, Proprietor of AYS Fridge Co Electronics, Peshawar, submitted that application for refund of Rs 383,000 was given on May 27, 2003, supported with documents ie invoices and sales tax returns.
Since there was no response, the complainant filed a representation on 26.9.2003 but without any result. The department had been evading payment on one pretext or the other.
During hearing, the department did not deny the allegation and offered no comment. The FTO held this was a clear admission of the facts.
The complainant had further pointed out that he had filed all the supportive documents and that he was not informed of any deficiency of documents.
The order reads: There was complete silence on the part of department if any supportive documents were asked for. The department never pleaded that it had required the complainant in writing to submit the requisite documents for processing and deciding the claim.
The order noted that the department's admission proved that the complainant had filed application with relevant documents, which were kept in the file without any action. Maladministration is fully established.
The order added that if the documents filed by the complainant are not available on record, the complainant should file them within three weeks with supportive documents and the claim for refund should be decided within two weeks of the filing of documents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2004

Comments

Comments are closed.