AIRLINK 73.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.47%)
BOP 5.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.36 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.46%)
DFML 29.80 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.88%)
DGKC 83.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.06%)
FCCL 22.50 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.31%)
FFBL 35.05 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.43%)
FFL 10.00 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.32%)
GGL 10.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HBL 111.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.09%)
HUBC 139.01 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (0.96%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.91%)
KOSM 4.69 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.18%)
MLCF 38.70 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.39%)
OGDC 136.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.07%)
PAEL 25.70 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (2.23%)
PIAA 27.11 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.26%)
PIBTL 6.73 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.2%)
PPL 124.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-0.6%)
PRL 28.40 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.67%)
PTC 13.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-3.85%)
SEARL 54.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-0.97%)
SNGP 71.45 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.35%)
SSGC 10.50 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
TPLP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.37%)
TRG 61.03 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.54%)
UNITY 25.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 7,671 Increased By 6.3 (0.08%)
BR30 25,094 Increased By 68.2 (0.27%)
KSE100 73,071 Increased By 307 (0.42%)
KSE30 23,780 Increased By 4.7 (0.02%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Monday rejected a review petition filed by former lower court employee Ahtisham-ul-Haq seeking restoration of job. Ahtisham-ul-Haq was working in Civil Court Kharian as Record Keeper and Services Tribunal terminated his employment over leakage of state documents.

The Supreme Court also maintained the Services Tribunal ordered. Later, the petitioner filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against its orders.

A three-member bench of the  court headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Umar Ata Bandial dismissed the review appeal and remarked that it was not a matter of basic rights so the court had already rejected an appeal in this regard.

During the course of proceedings, the Chief Justice observed that the petitioner had also changed his counsel.

According to the law, the lawyer who will appear in the first case, the same lawyer will also appear in the review appeal so that no other lawyer could raise false hope for the petitioners in the review petitions, he added.

The counsel for the petitioner said that his client could not submit documents before the Sessions Judge due to strike.

The Chief Justice remarked that lawyers would be on strike not judges. The law makes its own way whenever such matters surfaces, he added. The court after hearing arguments dismissed the review petition and remarked that it was not a matter of basic rights.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.