AIRLINK 74.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-0.74%)
BOP 5.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.99%)
CNERGY 4.47 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.22%)
DFML 41.55 Increased By ▲ 1.82 (4.58%)
DGKC 87.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-0.47%)
FCCL 21.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.64%)
FFBL 34.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.13%)
FFL 9.98 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.36%)
GGL 10.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.38%)
HBL 113.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.18%)
HUBC 136.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-0.38%)
HUMNL 11.90 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (9.17%)
KEL 4.85 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.85%)
KOSM 4.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.72%)
MLCF 38.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.42%)
OGDC 135.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.32%)
PAEL 26.72 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.41%)
PIAA 20.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-7.51%)
PIBTL 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.2%)
PPL 122.40 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.09%)
PRL 26.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.15%)
PTC 14.49 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (4.17%)
SEARL 59.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.43%)
SNGP 70.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.09%)
SSGC 10.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
TELE 8.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.59%)
TPLP 11.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
TRG 65.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-1.06%)
UNITY 26.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.65%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
BR100 7,860 Increased By 35.9 (0.46%)
BR30 25,386 Decreased By -19.5 (-0.08%)
KSE100 75,294 Increased By 209.8 (0.28%)
KSE30 24,198 Increased By 103.9 (0.43%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has disposed of a complaint filed by Bi-axially Oriented Polypropylene ("BOPP") films manufacturer regarding grant of Pioneer Industry Status (PIS) by the Ministry of Industries and Production to manufacturers of Bi-axially Oriented Polyethylene Terephthalate ("BOPET") films. The CCP bench comprised Dr Joseph Wilson, Chairman, Dr Shahzad Ansar and Mueen Batlay who heard the case.
The complainant pleaded before the bench that BOPET films manufacturers do not qualify under the criteria laid down for the PIS, and they falsely claimed the pioneer status which has distorted competition in the relevant markets. It was alleged that the economic benefits of PIS granted to BOPET manufacturers has enabled them to abuse their dominant position in violation of Section 3 (1),(2) & (3)(f) of the Competition Act 2010 ("the Act"), ie, by charging predatory pricing and driving competition out of the market, preventing new entry and monopolising the market.
The Commission conducted a public hearing on September 4, 2014, wherein the Complainant and Respondents and representatives of Engineering Development Board submitted their views and comments on the matter. The assessment of abuse of dominance is dependent on the determination of relevant market which primarily comprises substitutable products in a particular geographic area. The products involved in the case were BOPP and BOPET film sheets produced in Pakistan.
Considering the characteristics, unique properties and suitability for their end usage, BOPP and BOPET film sheets are best used as complements of each other and are not substitutes. The Commission noted that since BOPP and BOPET do not form part of the same relevant market, therefore, the grant of PIS to BOPET manufacturers has not restricted, reduced or distorted competition in the market of BOPP.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.