AIRLINK 177.00 Increased By ▲ 2.40 (1.37%)
BOP 12.81 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.32%)
CNERGY 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.18%)
FCCL 42.02 Increased By ▲ 2.09 (5.23%)
FFL 14.84 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.09%)
FLYNG 27.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.47%)
HUBC 134.51 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (0.66%)
HUMNL 12.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.08%)
KEL 4.44 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.6%)
KOSM 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.83%)
MLCF 54.51 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (2.48%)
OGDC 222.58 Increased By ▲ 9.67 (4.54%)
PACE 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
PAEL 41.30 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.49%)
PIAHCLA 15.62 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.71%)
PIBTL 10.06 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (5.01%)
POWER 11.17 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.1%)
PPL 183.99 Increased By ▲ 12.88 (7.53%)
PRL 34.31 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (2.94%)
PTC 23.34 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.39%)
SEARL 91.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.33%)
SILK 1.11 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 33.98 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (4.52%)
SYM 15.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.25%)
TELE 7.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.13%)
TPLP 11.01 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.18%)
TRG 58.72 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (0.72%)
WAVESAPP 10.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.71%)
WTL 1.36 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.49%)
YOUW 3.81 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.53%)
BR100 12,023 Increased By 222.2 (1.88%)
BR30 36,605 Increased By 1166.7 (3.29%)
KSE100 113,713 Increased By 1459.4 (1.3%)
KSE30 35,302 Increased By 517.9 (1.49%)

LAHORE: A borrower backed out after giving consent on the appointment of evaluator to sell out pledged stock lying in the custody of bank through public auction, said sources.

The borrower had objected to the appointment of the evaluator on the ground that appointment of evaluator was non-proficient as the chemicals, which were to be evaluated, were highly inflammable and if sampling would be done without specialised care, the whole stock would be destroyed.

He further said that the evaluator does not have any expertise in conducting evaluation of such type of chemicals. Therefore, he sought replacement of the evaluator and proposed another company for the evaluation purposes, saying that the evaluator proposed by him is chemical experts, who could serve the purpose more efficiently and professionally.

However, the bank reminded the borrower that the evaluator was appointed after obtaining his consent. The management of the bank also stressed about the reputation of the evaluator, saying that the evaluator was a well-known chemical expert having a vast experience in conducting evaluation of such type of materials.

The bank management further pointed out that the evaluator being proposed by the borrower was not a recognised and approved evaluator by the State Bank of Pakistan. Therefore, the purpose of challenging the appointment of evaluator by the borrower after giving his consent to it was with ulterior motives to delay the matter.

The matter ultimately landed to adjudication where the relevant forum maintained that the borrower has admitted that the evaluator was appointed by his consent while the bank had raised no objection to expertise/ capabilities of the said evaluator for conducting evaluation of such type of chemicals.

Moreover, the borrower failed to corroborate his stance through any proof of document or evidence that the evaluator lacks expertise. Thus, in the absence of any proof substantiating his stance with regard to non-proficiency of the evaluator for conducting evaluation was turned down and a direction was made to the evaluator to continue with his job to evaluate the stock for public auction.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.