BR100 Increased By (0.39%)
BR30 Increased By (0.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.34%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.33%)
AGHA 7.65 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.79%)
BECO 5.65 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.54%)
BML 60.20 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (1.9%)
BOP 34.37 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.76%)
CNERGY 12.96 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.93%)
CSIL 6.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 57.78 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.21%)
FFL 16.29 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.56%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.67%)
KOSM 6.00 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.01%)
LOTCHEM 27.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.5%)
MLCF 101.49 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.83%)
NBP 204.90 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (0.56%)
NCPL 60.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.48%)
NPL 69.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.49%)
OGDC 321.10 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (0.25%)
PACE 11.17 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 43.29 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.39%)
PIBTL 16.79 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.39%)
PPL 230.24 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (0.61%)
PRL 71.60 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.82%)
PTC 71.86 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.29%)
SSGC 26.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
TBL 10.26 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (4.59%)
TELE 8.65 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.46%)
TPL 22.55 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.39%)
TPLP 15.43 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.12%)
TREET 24.95 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (3.4%)
TRG 59.98 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.23%)

LAHORE: The Punjab University (PU) on Monday assured the Lahore High Court that roll number slip will be issued to petitioner a Baloch student Sadia for LLB examinations.

The court sought replies from the respondents within a week as the petitioner’s counsel wanted to proceed further.

The court was hearing a petition of Sadia Baloch who challenged a notification suspending her from the university’s rolls after declaring her a miscreant student.

Earlier, the court asked the PU counsel to seek instructions on matter today.

The university’s counsel later returned to the court and presented another notification and assured the court that the petitioner shall be issued her roll number slip. He also assured the court to hold the proceedings before a discipline committee.

The court at this asked the petitioner’s counsel if he would like to press your petition further. The petitioner’s counsel responded in affirmation urging the court that the petitioner had challenged the powers exercised by the vice chancellor and other respondents against her. He said the subsequent notification presented by the university’s counsel did not annul the original notification.

The court at this directed the PU authorities to issue roll number slip to the petitioner without further delay and sought replies from the respondents.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.