AGL 40.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
AIRLINK 187.98 Increased By ▲ 9.91 (5.57%)
BOP 10.12 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.61%)
CNERGY 7.11 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.45%)
DCL 10.15 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.59%)
DFML 41.57 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 107.91 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (0.95%)
FCCL 39.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.08%)
FFBL 82.02 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.16%)
FFL 14.90 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (8.76%)
HUBC 119.46 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.18%)
HUMNL 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.36%)
KEL 6.40 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (8.29%)
KOSM 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
MLCF 49.47 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (2.85%)
NBP 73.66 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (1.14%)
OGDC 204.85 Increased By ▲ 11.09 (5.72%)
PAEL 33.56 Increased By ▲ 1.41 (4.39%)
PIBTL 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
PPL 185.41 Increased By ▲ 11.34 (6.51%)
PRL 33.61 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (3.1%)
PTC 27.39 Increased By ▲ 2.12 (8.39%)
SEARL 119.82 Decreased By ▼ -5.14 (-4.11%)
TELE 9.69 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.87%)
TOMCL 35.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.25%)
TPLP 12.25 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (5.42%)
TREET 20.26 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (9.99%)
TRG 60.78 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.48%)
UNITY 37.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.58%)
WTL 1.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.6%)
BR100 11,773 Increased By 249.7 (2.17%)
BR30 36,595 Increased By 1045.2 (2.94%)
KSE100 110,810 Increased By 1913.6 (1.76%)
KSE30 34,429 Increased By 620.5 (1.84%)

EDITORIAL: The Punjab government’s decision to reduce electricity bills by 14 rupees per unit for those consuming between 201 and 500 units in Punjab for two months at a cost of an unbudgeted 45 billion rupees to the provincial treasury - or around 15 percent of the budgeted provinces own resources of 294 billion rupees.

This announcement came in the wake of not only National Electric Power Regulatory Authority’s (Nepra’s) decision a week before to increase tariffs by 2.56 rupees per unit, under fuel adjustment charges, a decision reflective of the staff-level agreement reached on 12 July 2024 with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) under the 7 billion dollars Extended Fund Facility (EFF) programme pending approval by the Board subject to meeting certain ‘prior’ conditions, but more cogently taken in the wake of rising public discontent at the higher inflation that accounts for an increasing number of low middle to middle income earners unable to meet their kitchen budgets.

The income erosion of the general public - excepting 7 percent of the total workforce which is paid at the taxpayers’ expense that has been insulated against inflation through receiving pay raises well above the inflation rate - is largely due to administrative measures with respect to achieving full cost recovery by utility companies agreed with the IMF.

The press release uploaded on the Fund website notes that “provinces will take steps to increase their own tax-collection efforts, including in sales tax on services and agricultural income tax.

On the latter, all provinces are committed to fully harmonizing their Agriculture Income Tax regimes through legislative changes with the federal personal and corporate income tax regimes and this will become effective from January 1, 2025. …Restoring energy sector viability and minimising fiscal risks through the timely adjustment of energy tariffs, decisive cost-reducing reforms, and refraining from further unnecessary expansion of generation capacity.

The authorities remain committed to undertaking targeted subsidy reforms and replace cross-subsidies to households with direct and targeted BISP support.”

The announcement by the PML-N supremo, Nawaz Sharif, meets neither of these conditions as: (i) at present, the total budgeted federal subsidy to the power sector is a little over 1.6 trillion rupees inclusive of federal equalization subsidy that requires an urgent revisit after Wapda unbundling; the privatised K-Electric is budgeted to receive 174 billion rupees and a provincial subsidy to K-Electric would further compromise the federal government’s objective to raise efficiency through privatisation of Discos – a factor that must militate against the same measure being taken by the Sindh government; (ii) it is unclear which expenditure item would be cut to finance the 45 billion rupees for the subsidy though it is doubtful that the Punjab Chief Minister’s other freebie schemes, laptops and scooters for women students, would be affected, and, importantly, whether it will have an impact on the budgeted 630 billion rupees Punjab provincial surplus agreed with the federal government and the Fund; (iii) it was agreed with the Fund that subsidies must be targeted through Benazir Income Support Programme, which is not the case here and which would no doubt generate considerable concern amongst multilateral and bilateral donors; and (iv) the Punjab budget for the current year raised the target of own resources by 25 percent from the revised estimates of last year, against 30 percent from what was budgeted last year, showing a propensity to overstate resources, but farm income tax as a source of revenue is budgeted at the same rate as last year, with a whopping 79 percent reliance on federal transfers, the highest amongst all provinces.

In addition, it has to be acknowledged by the federal and provincial governments that inflation is also fuelled by large budget deficits incurred by the centre and the provinces funded routinely by borrowing either domestically or internationally.

This measure, without doubt, can be categorised as populist political gimmickry, with the capacity to inflict much damage on the national as well as the provincial economy, and by putting pressure on other provinces that have desisted from this economically unfeasible measure to follow suit.

The IMF, too, would be interested to know what impact this measure would have on the generation of surplus by the Punjab government envisaged in the federal budget and if there would be no impact on the provincial surplus then where will the money come from?

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Mahboob elahi Aug 20, 2024 10:19am
Freebies or Rewarees are just political move...ultimately Punjab to impose more taxes..
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Aug 20, 2024 11:41am
Failing economy is on tenterhooks now. Economy ecosystem depends on business ecosystem, n political ecosystem is killing both to extinction. Incompetence or greed, govt has put country in danger.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Test Aug 20, 2024 12:07pm
Rubbish article by someone. punjab can easily reduce solar panel scheme they have managed 700 billion for that. Don't know what world you live .Punjab should give subsidy from may to september.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mumtaz Malik Aug 20, 2024 12:11pm
"BR's observations and analysis are commendable. However, one question arises: after the tenure of this government ends, will the next administration criticize the subsidies provided?.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mumtaz Malik Aug 20, 2024 12:11pm
This has been a recurring ambiguity in Pakistan's political landscape."
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mumtaz Malik Aug 20, 2024 12:16pm
It's indeed true that the current situation is challenging not only for the poor but also for the middle class. They are struggling to manage basic necessities,
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mumtaz Malik Aug 20, 2024 12:19pm
They are struggling to manage basic necessities, from putting food on the table to covering other essential needs.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mumtaz Malik Aug 20, 2024 12:19pm
Moreover, it is crucial to address the issue of gas bills, as fixed charges of PKR 1,000 have been added. What kind of tax is this?
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mumtaz Malik Aug 20, 2024 12:25pm
It is suggested that all political parties should agree to reduce gas and electricity costs. Otherwise, the next government might criticize the lack of funds and question how they mange their own LUXR
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Faiz Jalib Aug 21, 2024 08:35pm
Divide and conquer. Federal govt to deflect criticism from itself has created an artificial divide forcing people to turn their guns to local govt .
thumb_up Recommended (0)