AIRLINK 77.84 Decreased By ▼ -2.55 (-3.17%)
BOP 4.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.02%)
CNERGY 4.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.61%)
DFML 45.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.12%)
DGKC 85.97 Decreased By ▼ -2.83 (-3.19%)
FCCL 22.45 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-4.71%)
FFBL 32.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-3.03%)
FFL 9.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.73%)
GGL 10.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.75%)
HASCOL 6.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-2.38%)
HBL 112.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-0.88%)
HUBC 141.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-0.95%)
HUMNL 10.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-7.82%)
KEL 4.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.77%)
KOSM 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.33%)
MLCF 38.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-1.75%)
OGDC 128.89 Decreased By ▼ -3.11 (-2.36%)
PAEL 25.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.93%)
PIBTL 6.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.2%)
PPL 117.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.05 (-1.71%)
PRL 25.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.15%)
PTC 13.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-2.28%)
SEARL 57.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.73%)
SNGP 64.99 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.68%)
SSGC 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.86%)
TELE 8.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.4%)
TPLP 10.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.99%)
TRG 65.24 Decreased By ▼ -2.91 (-4.27%)
UNITY 26.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.03%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
BR100 7,835 Decreased By -96.8 (-1.22%)
BR30 25,245 Decreased By -504.5 (-1.96%)
KSE100 74,667 Decreased By -908.6 (-1.2%)
KSE30 23,919 Decreased By -292.9 (-1.21%)

LAHORE: A taxpayer has accused the tax department for carrying out audit proceedings under repealed provision of the law.

According to sources, the taxpayer had filed income tax return electronically, which was treated by the department as an assessment order in terms of the income tax law. However, owing to the late filing of the return, taxpayer’s case was selected for audit under a repealed provision of the law and a show cause notice was issued on account of certain discrepancies found in the return and wealth statement, which culminated in passing of amended assessment order determining income level higher than what was claimed in the original assessment by the taxpayer. Being dissatisfied, the taxpayer appealed against the amended assessment order and the appellate tribunal annulled the disputed order.

The department was of the view that the income years related to the period covered under the repealed provisions can be brought under scrutiny. Therefore, the tribunal has erred to hold that power to use the repealed provision of the law was not available to the department after its omission from the Ordinance.

But the taxpayer stressed that any such power is not available to be exercised by the officers subsequent to the omission of the provision of the law. In the meantime, the taxpayer also approached the office of Federal Tax Ombudsman, who directed the department to withdraw the audit proceedings regarding late filing of return. The FTO has also dismissed a review petition filed by the Federal Board of Revenue, followed by another rejection of representation filed before the President of Pakistan. Both the forums held that department cannot be given the right to issue notice under a repealed provision of the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.