BR100 Decreased By (-0.4%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.65%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.29%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.22%)
AGHA 6.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.65%)
BECO 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.15%)
BML 55.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.5%)
BOP 30.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 12.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.77%)
CSIL 5.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.88%)
FCCL 51.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.26%)
FFL 14.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.41%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 5.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.49%)
KOSM 5.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-4.45%)
LOTCHEM 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
MLCF 90.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-0.99%)
NBP 161.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.74 (-1.67%)
NCPL 52.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.18%)
NPL 57.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-1.93%)
OGDC 315.40 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (0.64%)
PACE 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
PAEL 34.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.45%)
PIBTL 14.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-3.26%)
PPL 221.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.16%)
PRL 90.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.36%)
PTC 59.25 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
SSGC 23.39 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.39%)
TBL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
TELE 7.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.76%)
TPL 21.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-4.68%)
TPLP 12.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.3%)
TREET 21.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.84%)
TRG 54.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.58%)

LAHORE: A taxpayer has accused the tax department for carrying out audit proceedings under repealed provision of the law.

According to sources, the taxpayer had filed income tax return electronically, which was treated by the department as an assessment order in terms of the income tax law. However, owing to the late filing of the return, taxpayer’s case was selected for audit under a repealed provision of the law and a show cause notice was issued on account of certain discrepancies found in the return and wealth statement, which culminated in passing of amended assessment order determining income level higher than what was claimed in the original assessment by the taxpayer. Being dissatisfied, the taxpayer appealed against the amended assessment order and the appellate tribunal annulled the disputed order.

The department was of the view that the income years related to the period covered under the repealed provisions can be brought under scrutiny. Therefore, the tribunal has erred to hold that power to use the repealed provision of the law was not available to the department after its omission from the Ordinance.

But the taxpayer stressed that any such power is not available to be exercised by the officers subsequent to the omission of the provision of the law. In the meantime, the taxpayer also approached the office of Federal Tax Ombudsman, who directed the department to withdraw the audit proceedings regarding late filing of return. The FTO has also dismissed a review petition filed by the Federal Board of Revenue, followed by another rejection of representation filed before the President of Pakistan. Both the forums held that department cannot be given the right to issue notice under a repealed provision of the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.