BR100 Decreased By (-0.54%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.42%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.37%)
AGHA 6.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.75%)
BECO 4.39 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.92%)
BML 54.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-2.17%)
BOP 29.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.63%)
CNERGY 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.39%)
CSIL 5.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.07%)
FCCL 51.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.91%)
FFL 14.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.62%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.65%)
KEL 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
KOSM 5.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-4.11%)
LOTCHEM 26.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.38%)
MLCF 89.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-1.46%)
NBP 162.53 Decreased By ▼ -1.66 (-1.01%)
NCPL 52.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.52%)
NPL 57.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-2.15%)
OGDC 313.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.12%)
PACE 9.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.61%)
PAEL 34.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.96%)
PIBTL 14.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.31%)
PPL 219.15 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1%)
PRL 91.60 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.42%)
PTC 59.25 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
SSGC 23.37 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.3%)
TBL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
TELE 7.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.84%)
TPL 21.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-3.22%)
TPLP 12.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-3.34%)
TREET 21.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.41%)
TRG 55.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.06%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has taken notice of the harsh treatment of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to an old lady (senior citizen) by issuing multiple notices and ex-parte orders against her for the past many years.

An old lady and a compliant taxpayer before Tax Ombudsman was burdened with multiple notices for audit for the Tax Year 2016. She was engaged in textile manufacturing business, final showcause notice for compliance was issued.

However, the complainant applied for an extension which was rejected and an ex-parte order was passed creating demand of Rs2.7 million.

However, all the relevant details of purchases and expenses were not only filed but also duly examined by the officer but the ex-parte order was passed without considering the details available on record.

The complainant being aggrieved, took up the matter with the FTO.

In response, the chief commissioner–IR contended that the case of the complainant was selected under Section 214C of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Subsequently, the ACIR issued notice to produce records for the purpose of audit but the taxpayer did not fulfill its statutory duty. However, in order to provide another opportunity to the taxpayer, show cause notice was issued. As the taxpayer failed to make any compliance, the order was passed under Section 121(1) on the basis of failure to provide explanation.

According to the findings of the FTO, the issue was not assessment of income and determination of tax liability.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.