ANL 10.53 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.19%)
ASC 9.61 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3%)
ASL 10.54 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.29%)
AVN 69.00 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.88%)
BOP 5.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
CNERGY 5.27 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.35%)
FFL 6.55 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.18%)
FNEL 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.15%)
GGGL 11.40 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (3.17%)
GGL 15.20 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.2%)
GTECH 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.89%)
HUMNL 6.39 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.63%)
KEL 2.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 2.89 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 27.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-2.51%)
PACE 3.04 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (4.83%)
PIBTL 6.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.33%)
PRL 15.15 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (2.71%)
PTC 6.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.87%)
SILK 1.03 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.98%)
SNGP 26.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.77%)
TELE 10.18 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPL 8.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.33%)
TPLP 15.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.76%)
TREET 30.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.17%)
TRG 75.25 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (2.09%)
UNITY 21.70 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.6%)
WAVES 12.60 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.44%)
WTL 1.48 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.07%)
YOUW 4.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.04%)
BR100 4,225 Increased By 5.5 (0.13%)
BR30 14,473 Increased By 97.3 (0.68%)
KSE100 42,726 Increased By 58.7 (0.14%)
KSE30 16,246 Increased By 33.5 (0.21%)

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has issued show cause notices to 19 feed companies for collusive activities and, prima facie, entering into prohibited agreement in violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010.

The CCP took a suo motu notice of the concerns and complaints regarding a concurrent increase in feed prices and initiated an enquiry.

Data gathered from market sources showed that there was indeed a simultaneous increase in price by poultry feed mills and the average quantum of increase in prices also appeared to be similar, which raised suspicion of collusive decision making and a violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act.

The 19 units are: National Feeds Ltd; Supreme Feeds (Pvt) Limited; Asia Poultry Feeds (Pvt) Limited; Zubair Feeds (Pvt) Limited; SB Feeds (Pvt) (Fajr Feeds); Sadiq Feeds (Pvt) Limited; Jadeed Feeds Industries (Pvt) Limited; Islamabad Feeds (Pvt) Limited; Hi-Tech Feeds (Pvt) Limited; Sharif Feeds (Pvt) Limited; Mukhtar Poultry Feeds; Multan Feeds (Pvt) Limited; SS Feed Mills (Pvt) Limited; Mahmood Feed (Pvt) Limited; Kausar Feed Mills (Pvt) Limited; Qadir Angro Industries (Pvt) Limited; Suncrop Group (Feed Division); Royal Feeds (Pvt) Limited, and Al-Waris Industries (Pvt) Limited.

The enquiry observed that from December 2018 to December 2020, the feed mills colluded to raise the poultry feed prices by Rs825 per 50kg bag, thus, making the feed 32 percent costlier for the poultry farmers.

Moreover, data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) for September 2020 shows that chicken prices rose by 18.31 percent and eggs by 5.2 percent.

The rise in these prices coincided with an increase in feed prices by almost Rs100 per bag.

In October 2020, after another price increase by poultry feed mills (by Rs125 on layer and 175 on broiler feed), the chicken prices rose by 26.62 percent and eggs by 23.81 percent as compared to the previous month.

In November 2020, poultry feed prices rose again by Rs150 per bag, and the prices of chicken and eggs rose by 20.76 percent and 5.23 percent.

In December 2020, another price increase in poultry feed by Rs250 per bag caused prices of chicken and eggs to rise by 3.21 percent and 14.08 percent, respectively.

Moreover, multiple sources shared the concerns that some of the top poultry feed mills were meeting at different locations and fixing the feed poultry feed prices.

Therefore, exercising its powers under Section 34 of the Competition Act 2010, the CCP on 4 February 2021 carried out search and inspection of two major poultry feed mills based in Rawalpindi and Lahore to impound the proofs of their suspected involvement in collusive activities and collective fixing of poultry feed rates. Two authorized teams of CCP conducted the inspections and successfully impounded the relevant record including computer-stored information.

The impounded record revealed that officials of 19 feed mills were using an active WhatsApp group where one feed producer would announce its intended price increase and the rest expressing and sharing their willingness to follow suit.

Price discussions included the effective date and amount of the rise. These discussions and decisions were implemented on the ground, as evidenced by the official price lists of these companies.

Based on the examination and review of the documents/material impounded during the raid, the enquiry report has been concluded.

According to the enquiry report, from December 2018 to December 2020, the poultry feed mills have acted in a collective manner to fix the price of poultry feed, which constitutes a prima facie violation of Section 4 of the Act. Moreover, while poultry feed companies produce the poultry feed which are mostly located in Punjab, the feed is sold/supplied to poultry farms in Sindh and KPK to meet their requirements and therefore given the inter-provincial movement of poultry feed, any anticompetitive effects would have a spill over effect throughout Pakistan.

The feed companies have been called upon to show cause in writing within fourteen days and to appear and place before the Commission for hearing.

Once the CCP’s bench concludes the hearings, it will pass the order under Section 31 of the Act.

If proven, Section 4 violations entail a penalty of Rs 75 million in case of a business association and up to 10 percent of the annual turnover or Rs 75 million penalty in case of a company/business entity.

The companies against whom proceedings are underway can also compete for leniency (reduction in or waiver of penalty) under the CCP’s Leniency Regulations subject to provision of additional substantial information or evidence and acceptance by the CCP.

The CCP is mandated under the Act to ensure free competition in all spheres of commercial and economic activity, to enhance economic efficiency and to protect consumers from anti-competitive practices including deceptive marketing practices.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.