BR100 Increased By (0.29%)
BR30 Increased By (0.37%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.07%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.23%)
AGHA 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.15%)
BECO 5.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-1.6%)
BOP 33.95 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.8%)
CNERGY 10.63 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (8.36%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.21%)
FCCL 53.75 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.43%)
FFL 16.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.08%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.48%)
KEL 7.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
KOSM 5.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 29.87 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (2.61%)
MLCF 96.30 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.84%)
NBP 204.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.02%)
NCPL 57.06 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-2.03%)
NPL 67.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.5%)
OGDC 317.99 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.02%)
PACE 10.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.65%)
PAEL 41.90 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
PIBTL 16.78 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.7%)
PPL 220.44 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (0.32%)
PRL 49.05 Increased By ▲ 4.46 (10%)
PTC 69.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-1.37%)
SSGC 29.26 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.14%)
TBL 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.61%)
TELE 8.89 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.48%)
TPL 17.08 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (3.83%)
TPLP 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (3.8%)
TREET 22.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.35%)
TRG 60.26 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.38%)

LAHORE: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has held that reissuing show-cause notices after 19 years, without incriminating evidence, would be a blatant violation of the law and previous orders.

In a landmark case, the FTO decided the matter in favor of a commercial importer/exporter who had been embroiled in a nearly two-decade-long dispute with tax authorities.

The dispute centered on the importer’s refund claims for zero-rated supplies, which were repeatedly delayed and obstructed by tax authorities. The tax authorities proceeded against the importer alleging him of using fake/flying invoices while the taxpayer tried his level best to satisfy the authorities.

The importer approached the office of FTO and filed a complaint against the authorities for issuing show-cause notice to him (claimant/importer) in present matter which remained unresolved for about two decades with series/rounds of litigations, even in presence of order in his favour having been duly passed by the Commissioner (Appeal) and the Department neither filed second appeal nor sanctioned him the refund amount.

The FTO maintained that the case of the complainant had been mishandled badly by the department due to rapid changes in the jurisdiction and transfer/posting of the officers from one place to another.

Situation of the present matter had reached a stage where the department would have no choice other than to give effect to the order of the Commissioner Appeals as the same (order) had attained finality and department’s representation before the President against the FTO order had also been rejected.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.