BR100 Increased By (0.29%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.12%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.41%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.47%)
AGHA 7.81 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.77%)
BECO 5.20 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
BML 57.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-1.33%)
BOP 34.15 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.37%)
CNERGY 10.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.86%)
CSIL 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.89%)
FCCL 54.75 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (1.88%)
FFL 16.65 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.15%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.64%)
KEL 7.39 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.51%)
KOSM 5.76 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.13%)
LOTCHEM 29.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.84%)
MLCF 95.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-1.1%)
NBP 203.95 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (0.21%)
NCPL 57.20 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.62%)
NPL 68.38 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (1.59%)
OGDC 317.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.26%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.13%)
PAEL 43.00 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (2.94%)
PIBTL 16.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.24%)
PPL 220.20 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.01%)
PRL 49.29 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.49%)
PTC 70.90 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.27%)
SSGC 28.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-2.54%)
TBL 9.85 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
TELE 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
TPL 18.37 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (6.99%)
TPLP 13.05 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4.32%)
TREET 22.71 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.53%)
TRG 59.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.95%)
By

FRANKFURT, (Germany): Companies in Germany can only promote their products as “climate neutral” if they back up the environmental claims with sufficient detail in the advert itself, a top court ruled Thursday.

The ruling was made in a case brought against German confectionery manufacturer Katjes by an association that aims to tackle unfair business practices.

It centred on an advert that appeared in a trade publication for the food industry, which stated that “since 2021, Katjes has been producing all products in a climate-neutral fashion”.

It included a picture of a packet of fruit gums with a “climate neutral” logo and the website address of a partner firm that helps companies in reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

The ruling found the production of the sweets was not carbon-neutral however — rather, the confectionery manufacturer supported environmental protection projects to offset emissions through its partner.

Two lower courts had dismissed the case but the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ruled in favour of the association, the Centre for Combatting Unfair Competition.

“In the case of advertising that uses an ambiguous environmental term such as ‘climate neutral’, the specific meaning must be explained in the advertising itself in order to avoid misleading the public,” the court said in its decision.

The risks of misleading were “particularly high” in environment-related advertising, it said, adding that labels such as “climate neutral” were important for consumers when making purchasing decisions.

When it came to the Katjes advert, it was vital to explain the claim as directly reducing emissions is considered more important for climate protection than offsetting them, the court found.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.