AIRLINK 74.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.34%)
BOP 5.14 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.78%)
CNERGY 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.94%)
DFML 37.15 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (3.66%)
DGKC 89.90 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.16%)
FCCL 22.40 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.9%)
FFBL 33.03 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.95%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.46%)
HBL 115.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.35%)
HUBC 137.10 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (0.93%)
HUMNL 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.12%)
KEL 4.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
KOSM 4.83 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.65%)
MLCF 39.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.33%)
OGDC 138.20 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.22%)
PAEL 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.16%)
PIAA 24.24 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-7.76%)
PIBTL 6.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
PPL 123.62 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.59%)
PRL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.66%)
PTC 13.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.71%)
SEARL 61.75 Increased By ▲ 3.05 (5.2%)
SNGP 70.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.36%)
SSGC 10.52 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.54%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TPLP 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-2.46%)
TRG 64.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.33%)
UNITY 26.76 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (2.73%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,874 Increased By 36.2 (0.46%)
BR30 25,599 Increased By 139.8 (0.55%)
KSE100 75,342 Increased By 411.7 (0.55%)
KSE30 24,214 Increased By 68.6 (0.28%)

LAHORE: A tax officer passed an assessment order beyond the show-cause notice without confronting the same to the taxpayer, said sources.

According to details, one herbal seller received a show-cause notice alleging that his income shown in the income tax return renders him liable for sales tax registration and payment of sales tax on supplies made by him during the tax period mentioned in the notice. It was followed by passing an assessment order under the sales tax provisions by creating a tax demand.

However, the taxpayer challenged the order on the ground that the order has been passed beyond the show-cause notice as the tax has been created without confronting the same to him, therefore, the order is illegal. He further said that no demand could have been created without first confronting the same to him in the show-cause notice.

It is also worth noting that the show-cause notice was totally silent and had not mentioned any allegation as had been mentioned in the order under question. The Commissioner Appeal had also noticed the illegality and wrote a letter to seek opinion of the department; however, no one appeared on behalf of the department.

The Commissioner had noticed that no invoice or allegations as levied in the assessment order were confronted to the taxpayer. Instead, the department preferred to carry out compulsory registration proceedings against the taxpayer under the sales tax provisions and created a tax demand for recovery purposes along with default surcharge and penalty for violating the relevant provisions.

The taxpayer agitated that proceedings initiated on the basis of illegal notices and superstructure constructed thereon in the shape of amended order was null and void because it was passed beyond the show-cause notice and therefore not sustainable in the eye of law. Accordingly, the tribunal vacated the controversial order.

Sources said the tax officers generate unlawful demands to meet revenue targets, leading to controversies between the department and taxpayers, wasting precious resources and time of the relevant forums.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.