BR100 Decreased By (-0.23%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.01%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.19%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.24%)
AGHA 7.74 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.65%)
BECO 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.38%)
BML 60.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-1.99%)
BOP 36.46 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.28%)
CNERGY 11.94 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (6.13%)
CSIL 6.17 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 57.36 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.84%)
FFL 16.58 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.35%)
KOSM 6.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
LOTCHEM 27.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
MLCF 102.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-0.99%)
NBP 206.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.28 (-0.62%)
NCPL 62.62 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.13%)
NPL 71.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.28%)
OGDC 319.19 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (0.22%)
PACE 11.38 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.89%)
PAEL 43.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.13%)
PIBTL 16.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.36%)
PPL 221.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-0.42%)
PRL 63.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.09%)
PTC 72.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.03%)
SSGC 27.28 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
TBL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
TELE 8.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.16%)
TPL 20.68 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.67%)
TPLP 14.98 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.07%)
TREET 24.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 63.29 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.48%)
BR Research

Coal comfort

Published Updated

After reaching their peak in March of last year—at US$441 per ton for South African Richards Bay (API4), international coal prices have been on a decline, the downward trajectory becoming more decisive since Dec-22. Now, in the last week of May, coal prices have been trailing US$110 per ton, down 75 percent since the historic peak that materialized last year. Though still well above the coal price average in 2020 and the 5-year average prior to that, coal prices have fallen significantly since last year, as inventories have grown to meet prevalent demand. Here at home, this is good news.

Cement manufacturers in Pakistan consume coal as a major energy source for production and coal constitutes about 60 percent of their primary costs, hence have a huge bearing on margins. With rising coal prices globally in the immediate aftermath of Russian invasion of Ukraine, cement manufacturers were able to divert their coal procurement from global suppliers to coal suppliers in Afghanistan. Afghan coal was more affordable. With international coal prices now on a decline, more options are opening up.

For cement manufacturers located near the port (South zone players), the decline in international coal prices is a major cost advantage specially since freight rates are also falling. They will find it more feasible to import coal from abroad, than procure it from Afghanistan where they incur inland freight and whose prices have been slow to catch up with the global downward decline in coal prices. Last year when coal prices shot up and Pakistan committed to importing more coal from Afghani coal suppliers, the Afghan government was quick to hike up prices, but they haven’t been as quick to drop them.

Manufacturers in the North are likely to continue to utilize Afghan coal as prices are close to Richards Bay coal and may not benefit from shifting. The only problem now is prevailing LC restrictions that are making most importers nervous about keeping their plants operational as they run short of imported inputs. Though international coal may become more cost effective for cement manufacturers in the south, the benefits may not be accrued until import restrictions ease, whenever that may be.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Az_Iz Jun 01, 2023 04:36am
Even after adjusting for calorific value,?Thar coal is still cheaper.
0
Ch K A Nye Jun 04, 2023 11:50am
@Az_Iz, what about the Sulphur content?
0