BR100 Increased By (0.51%)
BR30 Increased By (0.48%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.31%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.23%)
BECO 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
BML 57.70 Increased By ▲ 4.95 (9.38%)
BOP 34.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 8.22 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.74%)
DCL 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.54%)
FCCL 54.15 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.48%)
FCSC 5.27 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.96%)
FFL 18.13 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.55%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.54%)
HUMNL 11.34 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.09%)
KEL 8.15 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
KOSM 5.46 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.49%)
MLCF 89.00 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.08%)
NBP 186.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.04%)
PACE 10.73 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
PAEL 40.60 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (1.65%)
PIAHCLA 26.33 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.61%)
PIBTL 17.44 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.69%)
PPL 233.13 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.15%)
PRL 34.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.14%)
PTC 66.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.73 (-1.08%)
SEARL 91.31 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.42%)
SSGC 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.29%)
TELE 8.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.7%)
THCCL 64.80 Increased By ▲ 4.67 (7.77%)
TPLP 9.04 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.2%)
TREET 24.75 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.86%)
TRG 72.82 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (1.49%)
WAVES 10.47 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (4.91%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan of the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday refused to hear a plea of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf Chair-man Imran Khan challenging ban imposed by the Pakistan Electronic and Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on airing his speeches and press talks.

The judge recused himself from hearing the petition citing personal reasons and referred the same to Chief Justice for its disposal by some other appropriate bench.

The Pemra had imposed the ban after Imran Khan lashed out at former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa for what he called ‘protecting incumbent rulers in their alleged corruption cases’.

The petitioner through his counsel argued that the Pemra issued the impugned order without having regard to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.

He said a plain reading of section 27 of the Pemra Ordinance, prima-facie, showed that it does not empower the authority to issue a blanket prohibition order. He also pointed out that a judgment handed down by the Islamabad High Court declared a similar prohibition order against the petitioner as ultra vires of the Ordinance.

The petitioner alleged that the Pemra without applying its mind on the behest of the federal government took the illegal and unlawful action against the petitioner to settle political rivalries.

He therefore prayed the court to set aside the impugned ban for being violative to Article 10-A of the constitution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.