AIRLINK 73.06 Decreased By ▼ -6.94 (-8.68%)
BOP 5.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.74%)
CNERGY 4.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2.02%)
DFML 32.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.71 (-7.71%)
DGKC 75.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.39 (-1.81%)
FCCL 19.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-2.3%)
FFBL 36.15 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (1.54%)
FFL 9.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.25%)
GGL 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-3.05%)
HBL 116.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.26%)
HUBC 132.69 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.14%)
HUMNL 7.10 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.57%)
KEL 4.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-5.16%)
KOSM 4.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-5.38%)
MLCF 36.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.30 (-3.47%)
OGDC 133.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-0.72%)
PAEL 22.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.31%)
PIAA 26.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-2.33%)
PIBTL 6.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3.82%)
PPL 115.31 Increased By ▲ 3.21 (2.86%)
PRL 26.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.1%)
PTC 14.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.95%)
SEARL 53.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.94 (-5.21%)
SNGP 67.25 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.37%)
SSGC 10.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.2%)
TELE 8.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-9.36%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-3.85%)
TRG 63.87 Decreased By ▼ -5.13 (-7.43%)
UNITY 25.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.45%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.79%)
BR100 7,465 Decreased By -57.3 (-0.76%)
BR30 24,199 Decreased By -203.3 (-0.83%)
KSE100 71,103 Decreased By -592.5 (-0.83%)
KSE30 23,395 Decreased By -147.4 (-0.63%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has decided to engage third party auditors to conduct cost audit of registered agricultural tractor manufacturers, who are claiming sales tax refunds.

The FBR has issued SRO 563(I) to amend the Sales Tax Rules 2006 for notifying new rules i,e, “Refund to Agricultural Tractor Manufacturers”.

The provisions of these rules shall apply only if the incidence of tax sought to be refunded has not been passed on to the consumers.

According to the new rules, in order to determine that the incidence of excess input tax claimed as refund under these rules by an eligible person has not been passed on to the consumers, annual cost audit will be conducted by a Cost Accountant authorised by the Board. The cost audit for a tax year shall be conducted on the basis of twelve sales tax returns for the tax year, documents filed for refund under these rules, and any other documents called by the Cost Accountant.

The refund procedure shall apply to existing and future refund claims as filed by the registered agricultural tractor manufacturers engaged in supply of agricultural tractors. The provisions of these rules shall apply only if the incidence of tax sought to be refunded has not been passed on to the consumers.

Millat Tractors case: President asks FBR to finalise refund payments as per rules

The “agricultural tractor” means a tractor used by farmers or growers engaged in production of agricultural produce through tractor; and “eligible person” means manufacturer of agricultural tractors who supplies tractors to a person holding a valid proof of land holding such as agriculture pass book and copy of record of rights of agricultural land duly verified from Provincial Land Revenue Authorities.

Only eligible persons shall qualify for availing reduced rate under the Sr. No. 25 of Table-1 of the eighth schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990.

The eligible person shall file a refund claim through STARR/RCPS system and refund application to the Commissioner Inland Revenue having jurisdiction, along with the specified documents.

The rules said that where the processing officer or the officer-in charge is of the opinion that any further inquiry or audit is required in respect of refund claim or for any other reason to establish genuineness and admissibility of the claim, he may make or cause to make such inquiry or audit as deemed appropriate, after seeking approval from the concerned Additional Commissioner and inform the refund claimant accordingly. Audit under this rule shall be completed within thirty days of initiation of the proceedings.

The refund of admissible excess input tax shall be allowed and issued within seven days of the completion of proceedings initiated under rule 39S and in case no pre-refund audit is conducted, within fifteen days of filing of the refund claim. In any case the refund of admissible excess input tax under these rules shall not be processed through FASTER module. Filing of complete refund claim.— within fifteen days of the sanctioning of refund, the eligible person shall file a complete refund claim along with the requisite supportive documents prescribed under Chapter V of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006, FBR added.

The rules added that the post refund audit of the refund claims processed under these rules shall be carried out by the concerned division based on the documents submitted by the eligible person and any other relevant documents called by the concerned officer to ascertain the admissibility and genuineness of the refund processed and issued under rule 39T. The proceedings under this rule shall be concluded within sixty days of filing of a complete refund claim by the refund claimant under rule 39U, FBR added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

samir sardana Apr 30, 2022 11:38am
Basically,, the sale of Capital Goods, to Agri = DEE,MED EXPORT W/o it the agri output would reduce, and the nation would need to import, and suffer inflation IMPORT = DEEMED EXPORT So there has to be A REFUND OF TERMINAL DUTIES AND TAXES, AS THE VAT CHAIN ENDS,WITH THE FARMER ! So for the tractor maker, the
thumb_up Recommended (0)
samir sardana Apr 30, 2022 11:52am
Solution - Part 1 Basically,, the sale of Capital Goods, to Agri = DEEMED EXPORT W/o it the agri output would reduce, and the nation would need to import, and suffer inflation IMPORT = DEEMED EXPORT So there has to be A REFUND OF TERMINAL DUTIES AND TAXES, AS THE VAT CHAIN ENDS,WITH THE FARMER ! So for the tractor maker,the 1st step is to make the BOM (Bill of Material) ,which will remain constant (by and large),except for some value engineering and material substitution from time to time That BOM can be benchmarked with Chinese and other tractor makers,and then audited for norms for wastages and losses.The tractor can be reverse mapped,and each part and component,weighed and its manufacturing process mapped – to freeze the norms of wastages and losses (linked to capacity usage) Once the BOM is frozen,then you have to cost it – which can be audited,from bills (based on actuals).dindooohindoo
thumb_up Recommended (0)
samir sardana Apr 30, 2022 11:52am
Solution - Part 2 Then the last step,is the Non Variable costs,where an optimal capacity usage,has to be fixed – and the costs have to be ALLLOCATED AND APPORTIONED TO TRACTORS,AND COST CENTRES (like spares and research) AND SERVICE CENTRES (like warranty ).Then only,the VAT on costs allocated to tractors can be reimbursed.Ideally,VAT on indirect costs.,should NOT be subject to drawback – as that should be left to management efficiency and ingenuity,to reduce and optimise. INSTEAD OF GIVING DRAWBACK, THE TRACTOR MAKERS CAN GET IMPORT LICENCES TO IMPORT,DUTY FREE,THE COMPONENTS AND MATERIALS – AND CAN TIE UP,WITH SOME LARGE TRACTOR MAKERS, IN SAY,CHINA – WHOSE COSTS WILL BE MUCH LOWER,THAN THE ONES MADE IN PAKISTAN.THIS WILL ALSO SOLVE THE CASH FLOW ISSUE OF THE DRAWBACK, FOR THE GOVERNMENT.dindooohindoo
thumb_up Recommended (0)