BR100 Increased By (0.44%)
BR30 Increased By (1.39%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.62%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.61%)
BECO 5.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.09%)
BML 55.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-1.89%)
BOP 35.38 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.74%)
CNERGY 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.61%)
DCL 11.55 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.35%)
FCCL 58.36 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.84%)
FCSC 5.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.58%)
FFL 17.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.22%)
FNEL 1.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.45%)
KEL 8.75 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.92%)
KOSM 6.69 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.67%)
MLCF 107.15 Increased By ▲ 3.85 (3.73%)
NBP 201.73 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (0.77%)
PACE 11.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
PAEL 44.49 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (2.35%)
PIAHCLA 29.41 Increased By ▲ 1.92 (6.98%)
PIBTL 18.64 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (5.31%)
PPL 247.98 Increased By ▲ 3.66 (1.5%)
PRL 35.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.4%)
PTC 66.14 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.21%)
SEARL 95.49 Increased By ▲ 2.17 (2.33%)
SSGC 32.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.73%)
TELE 8.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.45%)
THCCL 66.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.16%)
TPLP 10.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.4%)
TREET 25.30 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.72%)
TRG 64.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.77%)
WAVES 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.27%)
WTL 1.26 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.8%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Thursday restrained the provincial government from any process of land acquisition for Ravi Riverfront Urban Development Project till the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the project.

The court observed that under Right to Fair Compensation in Land Acquisition Act 2013, the Indian Parliament made revolutionary changes and without seeking free consent land could not be acquired there.

The court held that it was a high time to deliver a judgment on the land acquisition laws in Pakistan.

The court adjourned to March 11 the hearing in multiple petitions and took notice of the land acquisition for the Ravi Riverfront Urban Development Project despite a stay order.

The court asked law officer as to why the land was being evacuated for the project after a stay.

The law officer said it was a public hearing by the land collector under section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894.

The court observed, during the previous hearing it was told that the notification issued under section 4 of the Act for the acquisition of the land had been withdrawn. He said it was unfortunate that the farmers were being subjected to maltreatment.

The law officer said the government had an understanding as if the court stayed construction work on the site only. He pointed out that another court also stayed the final decision on the EIA.

The court regretted that lives of the people had been shattered with the acquisition of their properties for the project of Orange Line Metro Train.

On behalf of a petitioner, Sheraz Zaka argued that the land acquisition laws had been blatantly violated as the farmers were being forced to sell their land. He said the government had not disclosed any public purpose of the riverfront project, which was mandatory under the section 4 of Act.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.