AIRLINK 74.85 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.75%)
BOP 4.98 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.61%)
CNERGY 4.49 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.75%)
DFML 40.00 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (3.09%)
DGKC 86.35 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (1.8%)
FCCL 21.36 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.71%)
FFBL 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.79%)
FFL 9.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.21%)
GGL 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.29%)
HBL 112.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.23%)
HUBC 137.44 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (0.91%)
HUMNL 11.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.03%)
KEL 5.28 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (12.1%)
KOSM 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (4.28%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.4%)
OGDC 139.50 Increased By ▲ 3.30 (2.42%)
PAEL 25.61 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (2.03%)
PIAA 20.68 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (7.48%)
PIBTL 6.80 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.34%)
PPL 122.20 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.08%)
PRL 26.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.26%)
PTC 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.86%)
SEARL 58.98 Increased By ▲ 1.76 (3.08%)
SNGP 68.95 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (2%)
SSGC 10.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.49%)
TELE 8.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.24%)
TPLP 11.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.63%)
TRG 64.19 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (2.2%)
UNITY 26.55 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
WTL 1.45 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.41%)
BR100 7,841 Increased By 30.9 (0.4%)
BR30 25,465 Increased By 315.4 (1.25%)
KSE100 75,114 Increased By 157.8 (0.21%)
KSE30 24,114 Increased By 30.8 (0.13%)

The captioned letters in your esteemed daily reveals an eye-catching scam of 200 billion rupees. Malpractice, over a decade back, when importers paid unwittingly, unwarranted, illegal charges has assumed the proportion of a scam, making importers conscious of exploitation. But, the authorities are unmoved.
Apathy to the scam of this magnitude is evidence of official patronage for unabashed, illegal recoveries. I dare say that the high-ups contrived and manoeuvred to (i) merge all the charges and rename it "Logistic" charges (ii) legitimise illegal charges, through dubious means (iii) shunted and rotated the issue to and between Revenue Division, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Ports and Shipping (iv) obviated addressing the issue through the ineffective Shipping Rates Advisory Board, constituted in 2001 and now through the proposed futile Shipping Rates Advisory Committee to "regulate shipping rates" that it not applicable at all.
The issue is simple: Adhere to applicable law, rules and procedures; but it is tactically made complicated, confused to not resolve it. Licensees of KPT/Ministry of Ports & Shipping blatantly recovered charges not applicable or recovered excess than applicable and specified in the Schedule of Charges under the KPT Act.
The Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) in his findings dated 31.5.2008 observed: "The Terminal Operators cannot change, on their own, any rates without the approval of the Agency. "The Agency is duty-bound to ensure that the charges, which have been fixed as per Implementation Agreement, are strictly adhered to". But, the findings are yet to be implemented, which proves that either the Agency is above the law or is impotent, or the Terminal Operators are defying lawful orders and have powerful backing.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.