AIRLINK 81.10 Increased By ▲ 2.55 (3.25%)
BOP 4.82 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.05%)
CNERGY 4.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.68%)
DFML 37.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.31 (-3.33%)
DGKC 93.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.65 (-2.77%)
FCCL 23.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.32%)
FFBL 32.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-2.35%)
FFL 9.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.39%)
GGL 10.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.89%)
HASCOL 6.65 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.68%)
HBL 113.00 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (3.2%)
HUBC 145.70 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (0.48%)
HUMNL 10.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.77%)
KEL 4.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.33%)
KOSM 4.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-3.29%)
MLCF 38.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-2.92%)
OGDC 131.70 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (1.9%)
PAEL 24.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-3.79%)
PIBTL 6.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.42%)
PPL 120.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.70 (-2.2%)
PRL 23.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.85%)
PTC 12.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-6.85%)
SEARL 59.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-2.01%)
SNGP 65.50 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.46%)
SSGC 10.15 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.63%)
TELE 7.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.13%)
TPLP 9.87 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.2%)
TRG 64.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.08%)
UNITY 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.33%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
BR100 8,052 Increased By 75.9 (0.95%)
BR30 25,581 Decreased By -21.4 (-0.08%)
KSE100 76,707 Increased By 498.6 (0.65%)
KSE30 24,698 Increased By 260.2 (1.06%)

The captioned letters in your esteemed daily reveals an eye-catching scam of 200 billion rupees. Malpractice, over a decade back, when importers paid unwittingly, unwarranted, illegal charges has assumed the proportion of a scam, making importers conscious of exploitation. But, the authorities are unmoved.
Apathy to the scam of this magnitude is evidence of official patronage for unabashed, illegal recoveries. I dare say that the high-ups contrived and manoeuvred to (i) merge all the charges and rename it "Logistic" charges (ii) legitimise illegal charges, through dubious means (iii) shunted and rotated the issue to and between Revenue Division, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Ports and Shipping (iv) obviated addressing the issue through the ineffective Shipping Rates Advisory Board, constituted in 2001 and now through the proposed futile Shipping Rates Advisory Committee to "regulate shipping rates" that it not applicable at all.
The issue is simple: Adhere to applicable law, rules and procedures; but it is tactically made complicated, confused to not resolve it. Licensees of KPT/Ministry of Ports & Shipping blatantly recovered charges not applicable or recovered excess than applicable and specified in the Schedule of Charges under the KPT Act.
The Wafaqi Mohtasib (Ombudsman) in his findings dated 31.5.2008 observed: "The Terminal Operators cannot change, on their own, any rates without the approval of the Agency. "The Agency is duty-bound to ensure that the charges, which have been fixed as per Implementation Agreement, are strictly adhered to". But, the findings are yet to be implemented, which proves that either the Agency is above the law or is impotent, or the Terminal Operators are defying lawful orders and have powerful backing.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2010

Comments

Comments are closed.