BR100 Decreased By (-0.4%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.65%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.29%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.22%)
AGHA 6.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.65%)
BECO 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.15%)
BML 55.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.5%)
BOP 30.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 12.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.77%)
CSIL 5.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.88%)
FCCL 51.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.26%)
FFL 14.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.41%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 5.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.49%)
KOSM 5.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-4.45%)
LOTCHEM 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
MLCF 90.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-0.99%)
NBP 161.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.74 (-1.67%)
NCPL 52.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.18%)
NPL 57.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-1.93%)
OGDC 315.40 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (0.64%)
PACE 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
PAEL 34.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.45%)
PIBTL 14.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-3.26%)
PPL 221.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.16%)
PRL 90.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.36%)
PTC 59.25 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
SSGC 23.39 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.39%)
TBL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
TELE 7.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.76%)
TPL 21.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-4.68%)
TPLP 12.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.3%)
TREET 21.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.84%)
TRG 54.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.58%)
Editorials Print edition: 2024-06-28

India: two-faced foreign policy

Published Updated
Photo: AFP
Photo: AFP

EDITORIAL: Confirming media reports that India has been providing drones and artillery shells to his country in its war on Gaza, a former Israeli ambassador to New Delhi, Daniel Carmon, has justified it as reciprocation for Tel Aviv’s support during the 1999 Kargil conflict with Pakistan. “The Indians”, he said, in an interview with a news outlet of that country, “don’t forget this and might now be returning the favour”.

Indeed, New Delhi received military supplies, including guided munitions and drones from Tel Aviv for its confrontation with Pakistan. This though did not happen in a vacuum. Although after initially voting against the establishment of Israel, India recognised it in 1950; but relations remained lukewarm in the next five decades; for the most part because India under Jawaharlal Nehru, who along with four other leaders, including Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt, founded the Non-Aligned Movement, did not want to offend the Arab countries. So the friendship failed to gain traction.

Interestingly, however, as revealed by thousands of Israeli documents declassified earlier this year, from the mid ’60s onwards the country, surrounded by its then hostile Arab neighbours, started forging ties with Hindu nationalist parties in India for their hatred of Muslims.

The strategy worked best when Narendra Modi came to power in 2014, and openly embraced Israel becoming the first Indian prime minister to visit Israel. The bond since has been growing from strength to strength, reinforcing ties in trade, defence and some other fields.

Yet adept at playing the game of running with the hare and hunting with the hounds, the Modi government has strongly condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza, terming the humanitarian crisis in the besieged enclave as “simply unacceptable”. That it said while supplying the aggressor with lethal weaponry for its campaign of genocide against the Gaza Palestinians.

Not very different is the policy towards the wider Gulf region. On the one hand, India maintains close economic and political relations with oil-rich Arab states, especially Saudi Arabia and the UAE, describing them together with Israel as its strategic partners.

On the other hand, it has significant economic engagement with their regional rival, Iran, from which not only it imports oil — disregarding US sanctions on that country — but has also helped Tehran develop the Chabahar Port which is to serve as major trading hub, connecting India via the port to Afghanistan and Central Asian states.

In theory ethics are central to international relations, but in practice increasingly assigned to the margins. India, obviously, subscribes to another view advanced by some scholars, according to which, the states’ behaviour is neither moral nor immoral — it is simply amoral. Ethics have no places in the conduct of its foreign policy.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

KU Jun 28, 2024 11:54am
When they see economic power, wise countries invest for future, morality/ethics is now euphemism. Lessons to be learnt is to become economic power with resolve, because we may be threatened next.
0
Re=== Jun 29, 2024 07:05pm
Look Indians make practical decisions in the interest of one thing--their country. Which country is based on morality and ethics? Pakistan?
0
Re=== Jun 30, 2024 05:35pm
Ethics have no place in the conduct of its foreign policy- where you have been living under a rock all these years and suddenly woke up to find this. Does Pak, China, USA, UK, Russia, have ethics?
0