BR100 Increased By (0.7%)
BR30 Increased By (0.5%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.64%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.68%)
AGHA 7.78 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.39%)
BECO 5.20 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
BML 57.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.16 (-1.98%)
BOP 34.30 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.81%)
CNERGY 10.84 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.17%)
CSIL 5.44 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.64%)
FCCL 54.65 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.69%)
FFL 16.68 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.34%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
KEL 7.40 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.65%)
KOSM 5.81 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.01%)
LOTCHEM 29.78 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.44%)
MLCF 95.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.63%)
NBP 204.51 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (0.48%)
NCPL 57.76 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.6%)
NPL 69.21 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.82%)
OGDC 318.49 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.08%)
PACE 10.82 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.79%)
PAEL 42.95 Increased By ▲ 1.18 (2.82%)
PIBTL 16.88 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
PPL 221.30 Increased By ▲ 1.13 (0.51%)
PRL 51.75 Increased By ▲ 2.70 (5.5%)
PTC 70.90 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.27%)
SSGC 28.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.84 (-2.88%)
TBL 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.84%)
TELE 8.90 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.91%)
TPL 17.79 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.61%)
TPLP 12.89 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (3.04%)
TREET 22.85 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.15%)
TRG 59.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.45%)

LAHORE: Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan of the Lahore High Court (LHC) on Wednesday refused to hear a plea of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf Chair-man Imran Khan challenging ban imposed by the Pakistan Electronic and Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) on airing his speeches and press talks.

The judge recused himself from hearing the petition citing personal reasons and referred the same to Chief Justice for its disposal by some other appropriate bench.

The Pemra had imposed the ban after Imran Khan lashed out at former army chief Qamar Javed Bajwa for what he called ‘protecting incumbent rulers in their alleged corruption cases’.

The petitioner through his counsel argued that the Pemra issued the impugned order without having regard to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.

He said a plain reading of section 27 of the Pemra Ordinance, prima-facie, showed that it does not empower the authority to issue a blanket prohibition order. He also pointed out that a judgment handed down by the Islamabad High Court declared a similar prohibition order against the petitioner as ultra vires of the Ordinance.

The petitioner alleged that the Pemra without applying its mind on the behest of the federal government took the illegal and unlawful action against the petitioner to settle political rivalries.

He therefore prayed the court to set aside the impugned ban for being violative to Article 10-A of the constitution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.