BR100 Increased By (1.54%)
BR30 Increased By (1.62%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.45%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.45%)
AGHA 8.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BECO 5.26 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
BML 60.00 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (1.01%)
BOP 34.20 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.42%)
CNERGY 9.65 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.84%)
CSIL 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.92%)
FCCL 53.40 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (2.93%)
FFL 16.88 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.14%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
KEL 7.49 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.81%)
KOSM 5.64 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.26%)
LOTCHEM 30.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.1%)
MLCF 97.66 Increased By ▲ 1.99 (2.08%)
NBP 208.64 Increased By ▲ 4.45 (2.18%)
NCPL 56.40 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (2.71%)
NPL 66.70 Increased By ▲ 1.96 (3.03%)
OGDC 324.85 Increased By ▲ 3.86 (1.2%)
PACE 10.79 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.37%)
PAEL 42.10 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (1.74%)
PIBTL 16.89 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.72%)
PPL 226.64 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (1.09%)
PRL 41.55 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.36%)
PTC 70.00 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (2.28%)
SSGC 29.26 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (2.99%)
TBL 10.09 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.9%)
TELE 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.27%)
TPL 16.81 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.42%)
TPLP 12.63 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (4.12%)
TREET 23.12 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.09%)
TRG 59.05 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (2.46%)
By

GENEVA: The United States is flouting international trade rules by imposing a “Made in China” stamp on goods imported from Hong Kong, the World Trade Organisation ruled Wednesday.

The US rule was introduced by former president Donald Trump in 2020, prompting a complaint by Hong Kong with the global trade body.

Trump announced the end of the preferential conditions granted by Washington to Hong Kong, after the imposition by Beijing of sweeping new security laws on the semi-autonomous territory.

A month later, in August 2020, US customs announced that goods imported from Hong Kong would have to be stamped “Made in China” rather than “Made in Hong Kong”.

But the WTO’s dispute settlement body said in its report that the origin marking requirement was “not justified” under global trade rules.

It ruled that the United States “has not demonstrated that the situation at issue constitutes an emergency in international relations”. The US rule also fell foul because it “accords to products of Hong Kong, China treatment with regard to marking requirements that is less favourable than the treatment accorded to like products of any third country”, the WTO panel concluded.

The difference in treatment changes competition conditions to the detriment of products from Hong Kong, it added.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.