BR100 Decreased By (-0.54%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.42%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.37%)
AGHA 6.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.75%)
BECO 4.39 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.92%)
BML 54.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-2.17%)
BOP 29.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.63%)
CNERGY 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.39%)
CSIL 5.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.07%)
FCCL 51.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.91%)
FFL 14.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.62%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.65%)
KEL 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.5%)
KOSM 5.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-4.11%)
LOTCHEM 26.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.38%)
MLCF 89.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-1.46%)
NBP 162.53 Decreased By ▼ -1.66 (-1.01%)
NCPL 52.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.52%)
NPL 57.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.27 (-2.15%)
OGDC 313.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.12%)
PACE 9.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.61%)
PAEL 34.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.96%)
PIBTL 14.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.31%)
PPL 219.15 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1%)
PRL 91.60 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.42%)
PTC 59.25 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
SSGC 23.37 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.3%)
TBL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
TELE 7.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.84%)
TPL 21.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-3.22%)
TPLP 12.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-3.34%)
TREET 21.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.41%)
TRG 55.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.59 (-1.06%)
By

GENEVA: The United States is flouting international trade rules by imposing a “Made in China” stamp on goods imported from Hong Kong, the World Trade Organisation ruled Wednesday.

The US rule was introduced by former president Donald Trump in 2020, prompting a complaint by Hong Kong with the global trade body.

Trump announced the end of the preferential conditions granted by Washington to Hong Kong, after the imposition by Beijing of sweeping new security laws on the semi-autonomous territory.

A month later, in August 2020, US customs announced that goods imported from Hong Kong would have to be stamped “Made in China” rather than “Made in Hong Kong”.

But the WTO’s dispute settlement body said in its report that the origin marking requirement was “not justified” under global trade rules.

It ruled that the United States “has not demonstrated that the situation at issue constitutes an emergency in international relations”. The US rule also fell foul because it “accords to products of Hong Kong, China treatment with regard to marking requirements that is less favourable than the treatment accorded to like products of any third country”, the WTO panel concluded.

The difference in treatment changes competition conditions to the detriment of products from Hong Kong, it added.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.