BR100 Increased By (0.3%)
BR30 Increased By (0.14%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.13%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.01%)
BECO 5.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.82%)
BML 57.56 Increased By ▲ 4.81 (9.12%)
BOP 33.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.79%)
CNERGY 8.17 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
DCL 11.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-3.73%)
FCCL 53.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.17%)
FCSC 5.33 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.11%)
FFL 17.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.72%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.30 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.73%)
KEL 8.13 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.25%)
KOSM 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.67%)
MLCF 88.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
NBP 186.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.05%)
PACE 11.69 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (9.05%)
PAEL 40.51 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.43%)
PIAHCLA 26.33 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.61%)
PIBTL 17.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
PPL 231.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-0.4%)
PRL 34.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.6%)
PTC 67.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.67%)
SEARL 91.40 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.52%)
SSGC 27.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.63%)
TELE 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
THCCL 64.80 Increased By ▲ 4.67 (7.77%)
TPLP 9.41 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (7.42%)
TREET 24.62 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.33%)
TRG 72.20 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.63%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)
By

WASHINGTON: The United States spends twice as much on cancer care as the average high-income country, but gets only middle-of-the-table survival results, a study said Friday.

The results were published in the Journal of the American Health Association (JAMA) Health Forum.

“There is a common perception that the US offers the most advanced cancer care in the world,” said lead author Ryan Chow, who is pursuing a medical degree and PhD at Yale University, in a statement.

America is touted for developing advanced new treatments and approving them faster than other countries, and the team were curious about whether this translated into better outcomes.

Out of 22 high-income countries, the United States was found to have by far the highest spending rate: it spends $200 billion per year on cancer care, or roughly $600 per capita, compared to the average of $300 per capita in high-income countries.

But the researchers found this additional spending did not translate into better population-level cancer mortality rates.

“In other words, countries that spend more on cancer care do not necessarily have better cancer outcomes,” said Chow.

The US was only slightly better than average, while six countries — Australia, Finland, Iceland, Japan, South Korea, and Switzerland — had both better outcomes and lower spending.

Of the countries examined, South Korea and Japan had the lowest cancer mortality rates, while Denmark had the highest, followed by France.

SMOKING

Smoking is the biggest driver of cancer deaths, a factor expected to make cancer outcomes appear more favorable in countries with traditionally low smoking rates such as the US.

After controlling for smoking rates, they found the US was exactly in the middle. Nine countries — Australia, Finland, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Norway, Spain, and Switzerland - had lower smoking-adjusted cancer mortality.

There are a constellation of factors behind surging costs in the US, the team wrote. Cancer drug expenditures account for 37 percent of privately insured US cancer expenditure, and these drugs cost far more in the US than other countries.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.