BR100 Decreased By (-0.98%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.58%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.97%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.07%)
AGHA 7.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.41%)
BECO 5.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.96%)
BML 56.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.57%)
BOP 33.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.62%)
CNERGY 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
FCCL 53.07 Decreased By ▼ -1.63 (-2.98%)
FFL 16.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.66%)
FNEL 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.81%)
KEL 7.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.76%)
KOSM 5.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.69%)
LOTCHEM 29.55 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.78%)
MLCF 92.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.46 (-1.55%)
NBP 202.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.05 (-0.52%)
NCPL 56.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.28%)
NPL 66.62 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-1.6%)
OGDC 318.98 Increased By ▲ 3.14 (0.99%)
PACE 10.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.85%)
PAEL 42.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.89 (-2.06%)
PIBTL 16.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.09%)
PPL 218.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.28 (-0.58%)
PRL 51.20 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (4.09%)
PTC 70.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-0.75%)
SSGC 26.96 Decreased By ▼ -1.29 (-4.57%)
TBL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.12%)
TELE 8.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.25%)
TPL 17.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.37%)
TPLP 13.44 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.28%)
TREET 22.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.75%)
TRG 59.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-1.1%)
By

WASHINGTON: The United States spends twice as much on cancer care as the average high-income country, but gets only middle-of-the-table survival results, a study said Friday.

The results were published in the Journal of the American Health Association (JAMA) Health Forum.

“There is a common perception that the US offers the most advanced cancer care in the world,” said lead author Ryan Chow, who is pursuing a medical degree and PhD at Yale University, in a statement.

America is touted for developing advanced new treatments and approving them faster than other countries, and the team were curious about whether this translated into better outcomes.

Out of 22 high-income countries, the United States was found to have by far the highest spending rate: it spends $200 billion per year on cancer care, or roughly $600 per capita, compared to the average of $300 per capita in high-income countries.

But the researchers found this additional spending did not translate into better population-level cancer mortality rates.

“In other words, countries that spend more on cancer care do not necessarily have better cancer outcomes,” said Chow.

The US was only slightly better than average, while six countries — Australia, Finland, Iceland, Japan, South Korea, and Switzerland — had both better outcomes and lower spending.

Of the countries examined, South Korea and Japan had the lowest cancer mortality rates, while Denmark had the highest, followed by France.

SMOKING

Smoking is the biggest driver of cancer deaths, a factor expected to make cancer outcomes appear more favorable in countries with traditionally low smoking rates such as the US.

After controlling for smoking rates, they found the US was exactly in the middle. Nine countries — Australia, Finland, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Norway, Spain, and Switzerland - had lower smoking-adjusted cancer mortality.

There are a constellation of factors behind surging costs in the US, the team wrote. Cancer drug expenditures account for 37 percent of privately insured US cancer expenditure, and these drugs cost far more in the US than other countries.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.