Huge state subsidies give China unfair edge over foreign rivals: OECD

PARIS: Chinese companies in 15 key industrial sectors received vastly more state support than their international competitors between 2005 and 2024, according to an OECD report released on Monday.

The 15 sectors received $108 billion in 2024 alone, according to data compiled by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in its Manufacturing Groups and Industrial Corporations (MAGIC) database.

Between 2005 and 2024, it added, “Chinese firms received on average three to eight times more government support than firms based in the OECD, a conservative estimate.”

“These subsidies were also considerably higher than the support received by firms based in non-OECD economies such as Brazil, India and Indonesia.”

The Paris-based organisation of 38 member countries said its “conservative” estimate was based on disclosures by the biggest companies in the 15 sectors, which underpin entire segments of the global economy.

It considers direct subsidies, tax breaks and favourable loans from banks and public financial institutions — at times below their base lending rates — to be public support.

“For Chinese firms, almost 60 percent of their global market share gains can be explained by the subsidies they received,” the OECD said.

Chinese firms have carved out huge market shares over 20 years in sectors such as solar panels, shipbuilding and steel, not because they are better than their US or European competitors but because of their unparallelled state support, it added.

With subsidies, they have more financial leeway to invest in new production sites, more time to reach profitability and greater support against economic headwinds, according to the report.

This has led to overcapacity in some sectors, pushing down global prices to the detriment of other international players.

“Just like doping in sports, the risk is that subsidies help less productive players win unfairly at the expense of better, more innovative and more efficient ones,” the OECD’s Secretary-General Mathias Cormann told a press conference.

“Subsidies increased market share but that did not lead to significant gains in productivity or profitability,” Cormann added.

“Firms won market share not by being more efficient or more innovative but by being more heavily subsidised.”

The OECD looked at aerospace and defence; aluminium; car manufacturing; cement; chemicals; fertilisers; glass and ceramics; heavy machinery; semiconductors; shipbuilding; photovoltaic panels; steel; telecommunications equipment; rolling stock; and wind turbines.