ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed a penalty of PKR 150 million on Mezan Beverages (Private) Limited. The company was found to have imitated the packaging and trade dress of PepsiCo’s Sting energy drink, thereby engaging in deceptive marketing practices in violation of Section 10 of the Competition Act, 2010.
The Commission held that Mezan’s “Storm” energy drink fraudulently copied the overall look, feel, colour scheme, bottle design, and branding elements of Sting, creating a likelihood of consumer confusion at the point of sale. The order concluded that such conduct amounted to parasitic copying and constituted deceptive marketing prohibited under Pakistan’s competition law.
The case dates back to 2018, when PepsiCo Inc. filed a complaint alleging that Mezan’s Storm energy drink was designed to imitate Sting and benefit from PepsiCo’s goodwill.
Instead of responding on merits, Mezan repeatedly challenged CCP’s jurisdiction and initiated prolonged litigation. Mezan obtained stay orders from the Lahore High Court in 2018 and 2021, delaying the inquiry for several years.
In June 2024, the Lahore High Court dismissed Mezan’s petition, upheld the CCP’s authority, and ruled that early challenges to show cause notices were not maintainable. The court also clarified that proceedings under the Competition Act are separate from trademark cases. The court ruled that challenging a show cause notice at an early stage was not maintainable and observed that Mezan had used litigation to delay regulatory proceedings.
In its detailed order, the CCP found that Mezan’s Storm energy drink adopted:
A red-dominant colour scheme identical to Sting, bold slanted white lettering with aggressive visual motifs, near-identical bottle shape and presentation, branding elements likely to mislead an ordinary consumer with imperfect recollection.
The Commission emphasised that deception is assessed based on the overall commercial impression, not minute differences examined side by side. Even though Mezan held a registered trademark for “Storm,” the CCP ruled that trademark registration does not grant immunity from competition law where consumer deception and passing-off are established.
The Commission, while imposing the PKR 150 million penalty, stated that copycat branding and misleading packaging will not be tolerated, regardless of the size or local status of the company.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2026
Comments
Comments are closed for this article.