BR100 Decreased By (-0.4%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.65%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.29%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.22%)
AGHA 6.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.65%)
BECO 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.15%)
BML 55.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.5%)
BOP 30.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 12.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.77%)
CSIL 5.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.88%)
FCCL 51.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.26%)
FFL 14.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.41%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 5.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.49%)
KOSM 5.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-4.45%)
LOTCHEM 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
MLCF 90.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-0.99%)
NBP 161.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.74 (-1.67%)
NCPL 52.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.18%)
NPL 57.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-1.93%)
OGDC 315.40 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (0.64%)
PACE 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
PAEL 34.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.45%)
PIBTL 14.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-3.26%)
PPL 221.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.16%)
PRL 90.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.36%)
PTC 59.25 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
SSGC 23.39 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.39%)
TBL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
TELE 7.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.76%)
TPL 21.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-4.68%)
TPLP 12.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.3%)
TREET 21.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.84%)
TRG 54.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.58%)
BR Research Print edition: 2025-09-19

An anti-farmer government?

Published Updated

Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) has reportedly floated another tender to import 0.1 million tons of sugar, on top of an earlier 0.1 million tons this month. On the face of it, the timing seems perfect.

World sugar prices are at a 50-month low, down nearly a quarter from domestic retail. For a government under pressure due to fears of looming food inflation, importing at these levels should have been a straightforward win: cheap supply to calm the market.

Except that is not what has happened. News reports suggest Pakistan has contracted its first consignment at an average of $565 per ton, almost 20 percent higher than the prevailing international average of $470. Even if one accounts for the fact that contracts are booked on a C&F basis, the math does not flatter.

At these rates, the landed cost is only about 13 percent lower than current retail. Once taxes, inland transport, warehousing, and financing are factored in, the price difference between imported sugar and domestic market rates virtually disappears.

This raises a basic question: if imports are not meaningfully cheaper, why now? The official answer is to relieve pressure on supply, with fresh crushing still two months away. But the timing betrays another effect.

By releasing imported stock right on the cusp of harvest, the state has stripped cane growers of the one bargaining chip they enjoy each year.

Ordinarily, a seasonal tightness before crushing allows farmers to negotiate better prices with mills. Now, that window is gone. Farmers already reeling from the impact of flooding on their crop will see their returns clipped even further.

Consumers, meanwhile, will not see much lasting benefit either. Any short-term dip in prices will be erased as soon as the imported stock is consumed.

Once the peak harvest glut is over, retail prices will resume their familiar upward climb during off-production months, egged on by lower cane output due to post-flood yield losses. The only guaranteed outcome is that TCP will book losses and the deficit will quietly absorb them next year.

So, the real beneficiaries of this import spree are neither farmers nor consumers. The sugar industry benefits from higher prices that will almost certainly bounce back by next March, the government buys a few headlines about temporarily “taming sugar” and ordinary Pakistanis are left with the same price cycle and a bigger fiscal hole. That is not reform, not stabilization, not even crisis management. It is simply anti-farmer policy dressed up as consumer relief.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Taha Sep 19, 2025 03:49pm
JazakAllah for raising this issue
0