BR100 Increased By (1.32%)
BR30 Increased By (1.33%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.35%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.45%)
AGHA 7.90 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.94%)
BECO 5.21 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.39%)
BML 59.23 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (0.97%)
BOP 34.28 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.75%)
CNERGY 10.92 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.92%)
CSIL 5.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
FCCL 54.21 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.87%)
FFL 16.83 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.25%)
FNEL 1.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.82%)
KEL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.92%)
KOSM 5.72 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.42%)
LOTCHEM 30.02 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.25%)
MLCF 97.30 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (0.98%)
NBP 205.80 Increased By ▲ 2.27 (1.12%)
NCPL 58.30 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (2.55%)
NPL 69.48 Increased By ▲ 2.17 (3.22%)
OGDC 321.03 Increased By ▲ 2.81 (0.88%)
PACE 10.76 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.22%)
PAEL 42.54 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (1.84%)
PIBTL 17.00 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.13%)
PPL 223.50 Increased By ▲ 3.33 (1.51%)
PRL 52.75 Increased By ▲ 3.70 (7.54%)
PTC 71.00 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (1.41%)
SSGC 29.61 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.61%)
TBL 9.78 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
TELE 8.97 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.7%)
TPL 17.27 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.58%)
TPLP 12.81 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.4%)
TREET 22.89 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.33%)
TRG 60.59 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.61%)

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has upheld the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) decision against Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM), affirming its ruling that the state-owned enterprise had abused its dominant position in the sale of low carbon steel billets.

The CCP had imposed a penalty of Rs25 million for PSM’s anti-competitive and discriminatory conduct. While acknowledging the violation, the Tribunal partially allowed PSM’s appeal and reduced the penalty to Rs5 million, citing the limited duration of non-compliance.

The CCP took suo motu notice in 2009 following media reports and a complaint by M/s Frontier Foundry (Pvt.) Ltd., which alleged preferential treatment by PSM towards a particular buyer, Abbas Group, at the expense of other market participants. CCP’s investigation revealed that PSM withheld supply of key steel products between November 2008 and January 2009 without any objective justification, thereby violating Section 3 of the Competition Ordinance, 2007.

The Tribunal observed that PSM failed to inform all buyers of product availability, enabling exclusive access for a single group and causing harm to other market players. Such conduct, the Tribunal noted, constituted abuse of dominance under Section 3(2)(g) and (h) of the Ordinance.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.