BR100 Increased By (1.02%)
BR30 Increased By (1.57%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.63%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.71%)
BECO 6.05 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (4.85%)
BML 53.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.11%)
BOP 34.34 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.03%)
CNERGY 8.18 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.86%)
DCL 12.36 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.31%)
FCCL 53.80 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.84%)
FCSC 5.28 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (4.14%)
FFL 18.06 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.61%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.55%)
HUMNL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
KEL 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.75%)
KOSM 5.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.54%)
MLCF 87.80 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (1.49%)
NBP 186.75 Increased By ▲ 1.59 (0.86%)
PACE 10.72 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.32%)
PAEL 40.06 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (1.62%)
PIAHCLA 26.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
PIBTL 17.35 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (4.08%)
PPL 232.27 Increased By ▲ 4.09 (1.79%)
PRL 35.05 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.07%)
PTC 67.20 Increased By ▲ 1.87 (2.86%)
SEARL 91.35 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (1.35%)
SSGC 27.22 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (2.33%)
TELE 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.86%)
THCCL 59.19 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.18%)
TPLP 8.75 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.45%)
TREET 24.70 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.69%)
TRG 71.51 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (2.58%)
WAVES 10.00 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.6%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)
By

NEW DELHI: Samsung has asked an Indian tribunal to quash a $520 million tax demand for allegedly misclassifying imports of networking gear, arguing officials were aware of the practice as India’s Reliance imported the same component in a similar manner for years, documents show.

Samsung becomes the second major foreign company in recent months to challenge an Indian tax demand.

Volkswagen has sued Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government in court for a record demand of $1.4 billion for misclassifying its component imports.

In the Samsung case, tax authorities in January asked Samsung to pay $520 million for evading the 10-20% tariffs by misclassifying imports of a key mobile tower equipment, which it then sold to billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s telecom giant, Reliance Jio, from 2018 to 2021.

In its 281-page challenge at the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai, Samsung criticises Indian authorities for being “fully aware” of the business model as Reliance had a “long-established practice” of importing the same equipment without any tariff payments for three years until 2017.

Samsung’s India unit says it discovered during an Indian tax investigation that Reliance had been warned about the practice way back in 2017, but Reliance did not inform the South Korean company about it and tax officials never questioned Samsung.

“The classification adopted by the appellant (Samsung) was known to the authorities, however the same was never questioned ... Department was fully aware,” Samsung says in its April 17 filing, which is not public but was seen by Reuters.

“Reliance Jio officials did not inform” Samsung about the tax warning of 2017, it adds.

Samsung and India’s tax authority did not respond to Reuters queries.

Further details of Reliance’s 2017 warning from tax authorities are not public and were not disclosed in the Samsung filing. Reliance didn’t respond to Reuters queries.

Other than $520 million demand Samsung faces, Indian authorities have also imposed an $81 million fine on seven of its employees, taking the total tax demand to $601 million. It’s not clear if Samsung employees are separately challenging the fines.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.