BML 4.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.24%)
BOP 12.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.53%)
CNERGY 7.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.12%)
CPHL 83.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-1.48%)
DCL 13.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-3.5%)
DGKC 171.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.46 (-0.84%)
FCCL 46.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.67%)
FFL 15.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.45%)
GCIL 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.69%)
HUBC 148.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.74 (-1.16%)
KEL 5.31 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.76%)
KOSM 6.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.34%)
LOTCHEM 20.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.53%)
MLCF 84.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.34 (-1.57%)
NBP 125.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.85 (-2.99%)
PAEL 40.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-2.73%)
PIAHCLA 21.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.26%)
PIBTL 10.13 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.4%)
POWER 14.00 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.43%)
PPL 163.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.29%)
PREMA 41.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.5%)
PRL 32.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-2.07%)
PTC 22.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-3.01%)
SNGP 115.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.52 (-2.14%)
SSGC 44.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-2.43%)
TELE 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-3.25%)
TPLP 9.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-1.68%)
TREET 23.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.38%)
TRG 55.82 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-2.09%)
WTL 1.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.32%)
BR100 14,134 Decreased By -4.9 (-0.03%)
BR30 39,571 Decreased By -563.9 (-1.4%)
KSE100 138,597 Decreased By -68.1 (-0.05%)
KSE30 42,341 Decreased By -12.3 (-0.03%)

LAHORE: An appellate forum has held that a bank guarantee can be enforced if the principal debtor defaults. According to details, a financial company, being a provider of financial facilities, had approached the adjudicating authority against three bank guarantees for recovery due to failure and default in repayment of financial liabilities by principal debtors.

The customers availed fiduciary credit facility and Moharbaha facility which were granted by a bank in favour of the financial company.

The bank challenged the actions on the plea that the financial company had not arrayed the principal debtor/customer. Therefore, the relevant forum cannot render a verdict without hearing the stance of the principal debtor. It further contended that without filing the financial documents by the customer/principal debtor, the relevant forum could not reach a just and fair conclusion. The bank also denied issuing of guarantees in favour of the customer, saying that they are fictitious.

The financial company, on the other hand, produced a letter where the bank had admitted its liability under the bank guarantee and acknowledged having paid the amount for guarantees in dispute. It asserted that it was incumbent upon the bank, as a guarantor, to honour the guarantee.

The appellate forum held that the guarantor’s responsibility is equal to that of the principal debtor, which means that if the principal debtor defaults or fails to repay the debt, the guarantor is equally liable to fulfill the obligation. The guarantor’s liability covers the entire debt of the principal debtor, ensuring minimal risk for the lender.

The obligation of the principal debtor and the surety is joint and simultaneous unless otherwise agreed in the contract.

The financial company has the prerogative to take action against the guarantor alone or include the principle debtor. Therefore, the contention of the bank that the financial company has not arrayed the principal debtor holds no merit. The financial company’s right to seek enforcement of the guarantee through legal proceedings was thus duly justified.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.