AIRLINK 182.14 Decreased By ▼ -2.57 (-1.39%)
BOP 11.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-4.04%)
CNERGY 8.21 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (9.47%)
FCCL 47.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-0.74%)
FFL 16.17 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.12%)
FLYNG 28.52 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
HUBC 143.22 Increased By ▲ 1.64 (1.16%)
HUMNL 13.41 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.75%)
KEL 4.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
KOSM 6.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.38%)
MLCF 59.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-1.86%)
OGDC 226.81 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (0.59%)
PACE 6.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.33%)
PAEL 48.23 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.19%)
PIAHCLA 19.39 Increased By ▲ 1.12 (6.13%)
PIBTL 10.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-2.99%)
POWER 11.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.2%)
PPL 192.27 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (1.38%)
PRL 39.13 Increased By ▲ 2.77 (7.62%)
PTC 24.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.1%)
SEARL 101.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-0.93%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 37.73 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.72%)
SYM 15.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.51%)
TELE 8.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
TPLP 10.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.66%)
TRG 68.53 Decreased By ▼ -1.78 (-2.53%)
WAVESAPP 11.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.34%)
WTL 1.42 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.43%)
YOUW 3.79 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.26%)
BR100 12,632 Increased By 30 (0.24%)
BR30 39,444 Increased By 151.5 (0.39%)
KSE100 118,770 Increased By 795.7 (0.67%)
KSE30 36,532 Increased By 36.4 (0.1%)

EDITORIAL: The poor performance of power sector companies cost the exchequer Rs660 billion in FY24 despite a significant upward revision in power tariffs. Of this, Rs281 billion is due to higher transmission and distribution (T&D) losses compared to the permissible limit. Notably, the share of the only private entity, K-Electric (KE), in these losses is a mere 2 percent, while its share in power distribution is 16 percent.

This alone highlights the benefits of privatisation. That the privatisation of distribution companies (Discos) is critical for implementing comprehensive reforms in the power sector is a fact.

The private entities, like KE, would have skin in the game, whereas government-owned Discos operate as cost centres. To attract private players, fair treatment of KE is essential, as it is crucial for improving power supply in Karachi, the country’s business hub.

Like any other utility company, KE incurs business costs, but recovery remains a significant challenge. One issue is the difficulty KE faces in obtaining regulatory approval from power regulator, Nepra, for Rs68 billion in write-offs for a seven-year period, as discussed in a recent hearing related to its Multi-Year Tariff (MYT).

Globally, no business operates without provisions for operational losses or bad debts. However, Nepra expects power utility companies to recover 100 percent of their billed amounts — an unrealistic expectation. The provincial governments between themselves owe over Rs 90 billion to the power utility companies in unpaid bills.

Power utility companies are compelled not to disconnect supply of power on account of non-payment by different departments of the provinces. The federal minister for power, Sardar Awais Leghari, has sought help of chief ministers for recovery of this huge outstanding amount.

All Discos have low recovery rates, and these losses are eventually borne by the government of Pakistan, contributing to the infamous circular debt, which has now soared to over Rs 2.8 trillion, according to industry sources. Part of this debt servicing cost is passed on to consumers, with Rs3.23 per unit currently being charged across Pakistan.

KE’s contribution to circular debt is zero, as its shareholders absorb all associated costs. However, KE consumers are still burdened with additional surcharges, which is unfair to both the company and its customers. During the recent hearing, KE’s plea for write-offs was poorly received by the audience and the regulator alike.

Many seem to believe it is their inherent right to receive electricity without considering the cost. Ironically, many Karachi residents willingly pay exorbitant amounts for water, a basic necessity but expect electricity to be free. This attitude may be tolerated in public sector companies but is unsustainable for private shareholders.

Despite this, Karachi consumers pay some of the highest electricity rates in the country, thanks to poorly negotiated federal contracts with power producers, a weak transmission system, and mismanagement by public sector utilities. They also face load-shedding in areas with high theft rates, where many consumers fail to pay their bills on time.

Despite removing hook (kunda) systems in Karachi, KE’s ability to recover bills from everyone is impaired, given the higher penetration of slums and poor law and order situation. Recoveries are nearly impossible without collaboration with law enforcement agencies, which are often influenced by political parties that protect power thieves.

It is unfair to expect the utility company to act as a policing agency, though it uses technology and other measures to curb theft. Complete elimination of theft, however, is nearly impossible.

The optimal solution is to allow for a certain level of non-recovery and approve legitimate write-offs. Without these measures, the privatisation of distribution companies will remain a distant dream, circular debt will continue to grow, and consumer tariffs will keep rising.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.

Test Dec 16, 2024 08:15pm
Again people writing articles without providing real insights create simple table and write losses of each disco we must know these figures mean nothing . they are not providing any insights
thumb_up Recommended (0)
KU Dec 16, 2024 08:42pm
As long as corrupt n thieves have a say in electricity production n management, country n people will continue to be skinned alive. You can kiss goodbye to feasibility, FDI n economic recovery.
thumb_up Recommended (0)