ISLAMABAD: Following directions of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), the Large Taxpayer Office (LTO), Islamabad has refunded an amount of over Rs2 billion to the Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO) to avoid contempt of court proceedings against the FBR officers.
It is reliably learnt that the development took place solely due to strict intervention by the IHC and LTO has returned back Rs2,073,206,658 vide Refund Order No01/2024 dated 28.02.2024 issued by the office of DCIR, Unit VII, Zone-II,LTO Islamabad to the IESCO out of tax recovered from attachment of bank accounts of IESCO.
When contacted, tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt told this correspondent that earlier, the IHC has summoned Member (Operations-IR) and Chief CIR, LTO Islamabad to appear in person before IHC, for violation of the order passed by IHC in tax recovery matters, by the field formations, specifically LTO, Islamabad.
The petitioner, IESCO, stated that the high handedness of the department (LTO Islamabad) over a period of time has almost resulted in the collapse of the IESCO economic activity. The respondents (LTO) in order to meet their revenue targets have targeted the petitioner. In order to achieve their revenue target they even paid no heed to the orders of the court.
Butt further added that IHC has also ordered to submit the names of LTO Islamabad officers who are involved in tax recovery moves through attachments of bank account of IESCO, while in the second petition by IESCO, the IHC has issued notices to high-ranking officials, including the chairman of the FBR, the member operations-IR, and tax employees of the LTO including Chief CIR, CIR and DCIR, Zone-II, Islamabad.
The IHC’s earlier order states, the petitioner is aggrieved by recovery notices dated 22.02.2023 pursuant to which coercive recovery has been affected from the accounts of the petitioner. The learned counsel states that the assessment was pending adjudication before the CIR (Appeals), who by order dated 21.02.2023 had dismissed the petitioner’s appeal. Such order was communicated to the petitioner at 02:00 p.m. on 22.02.2023. However, without issuing any prior notice after the dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal or even the communication of the appeal order to the petitioner, coercive recovery was affected at 09:00 a.m. on 22.02.2023 in breach of law. Coercive recovery is also in breach of the instructions issued by FBR by letter dated 20.03.2017 directing the Commissioners that coercive recoveries are not to be affected against discourse without the prior approval of FBR.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2024
Comments
Comments are closed.