THE HAGUE: The United States said on Wednesday the World Court should not order the unconditional withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Palestinian territories as it considers a request for its opinion on the legality of the occupation.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the top UN court which is also known as the World Court, was asked in 2022 by the UN General Assembly to issue a non-binding opinion on the legal consequences of the Israeli occupation.
While the court was not asked to issue an opinion about the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the occupied territories, many states participating in the hearings have called on Israel to do so.
Israel, which is not taking part, said in written comments that the court’s involvement could be harmful to achieving a negotiated settlement.
“Any movement towards Israel’s withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza requires consideration for Israel’s very real security needs,” Richard Visek, acting legal adviser at the US State Department, told the court in The Hague.
“We were all reminded of those security needs on October 7, and they persist. Regrettably those needs have been ignored by many of the participants” in the court’s hearings.
More than 50 states will present arguments until Feb. 26. Russia and France were scheduled to speak later on Wednesday.
On Monday, Palestinian representatives asked the judges to declare Israel’s occupation of their territory illegal and said its opinion could help reach a two-state solution.
Visek called on the judges to stick to the established UN framework for a two-state solution.
“In sum, it is important that the court keeps in mind the balance the Security Council and General Assembly have determined is necessary to provide the best chance for durable peace,” he said. “The court should not find that Israel is legally obligated to immediately and unconditionally withdraw from occupied territory.”
The latest surge of violence in Gaza that followed Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks in Israel has complicated already deeply-rooted grievances in the Middle East and damaged efforts towards finding a path to peace.
The ICJ’s 15-judge panel has been asked to review Israel’s “occupation, settlement and annexation ... including measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and from its adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures”.
Comments
Comments are closed for this article.