AIRLINK 74.85 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (0.75%)
BOP 4.98 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.61%)
CNERGY 4.49 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.75%)
DFML 40.00 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (3.09%)
DGKC 86.35 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (1.8%)
FCCL 21.36 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.71%)
FFBL 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.79%)
FFL 9.72 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.21%)
GGL 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.29%)
HBL 112.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.23%)
HUBC 137.44 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (0.91%)
HUMNL 11.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.03%)
KEL 5.28 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (12.1%)
KOSM 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (4.28%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.4%)
OGDC 139.50 Increased By ▲ 3.30 (2.42%)
PAEL 25.61 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (2.03%)
PIAA 20.68 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (7.48%)
PIBTL 6.80 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.34%)
PPL 122.20 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.08%)
PRL 26.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.26%)
PTC 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.86%)
SEARL 58.98 Increased By ▲ 1.76 (3.08%)
SNGP 68.95 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (2%)
SSGC 10.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.49%)
TELE 8.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.24%)
TPLP 11.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.63%)
TRG 64.19 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (2.2%)
UNITY 26.55 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
WTL 1.45 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (7.41%)
BR100 7,841 Increased By 30.9 (0.4%)
BR30 25,465 Increased By 315.4 (1.25%)
KSE100 75,114 Increased By 157.8 (0.21%)
KSE30 24,114 Increased By 30.8 (0.13%)

LAHORE: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) has declared that a delay in allowing effect to the higher court orders by the tax department is tantamount to maladministration as taxpayers suffer hardship due to an indifferent attitude of the department.

The declaration was made in response to a complaint filed by a taxpayer against non-issuance of refund. According to the complaint, the department initiated statutory proceedings during the pendency of refund application and an ex-parte order was passed against him.

The order was challenged before the commissioner appeals who upheld the additional commissioner’s order and the department adjusted refund amount without his consent and also recovered certain amount.

The complainant filed an appeal before the appellate tribunal, which vacated the order of two authorities below and remanded the matter to additional commissioner for decision afresh. The department, instead, preferred to file a reference before the high court that was dismissed.

The complainant approached the department to give effect to the order passed by the tribunal but failed to get any response. The complainant made several visits to the concerned tax authorities but nothing happened despite clear directions from the higher fora. Meanwhile, the complainant also made written requests through a series of letters and reminders but all in vain.

When the FTO referred the matter to Secretary Revenue Division, the department contended that the concerned tax authority has taken up the matter for de novo proceedings and refund cannot be issued until the completion of the proceedings.

It was also pointed out in the reply that the tax demand was created by the audit range of the regional tax office but the case was transferred to the zone while the direction was passed by the higher forum. Therefore, an extension was sought from the office of the FTO of 15 days for obtaining the court order by the zone.

The FTO noted that an inattention to court orders was attributes to frequent change in jurisdiction within the concerned RTO and posting/transfer of officers. The department has not only failed to give effect to court orders within prescribed time but also failed to respond to multiple letters and reminders by the complainant.

Accordingly, the department committed maladministration by neglecting, in attending and delaying discharge of duties and responsibilities. It further pointed out that the department’s stance that court order was not received it was not vindicated from the record. The taxpayer/complainant has suffers hardship due to indifferent attitude of the department.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed.