BR100 Decreased By (-0.27%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.6%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.53%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.81%)
BECO 5.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-3.48%)
BML 57.82 Increased By ▲ 5.07 (9.61%)
BOP 33.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.31%)
CNERGY 8.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 11.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.38%)
FCCL 53.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.63%)
FCSC 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (4.41%)
FFL 17.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.89%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.45%)
KEL 8.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.99%)
KOSM 5.46 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.49%)
MLCF 87.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.28%)
NBP 184.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.18 (-1.17%)
PACE 11.60 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (8.21%)
PAEL 40.20 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.65%)
PIAHCLA 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
PIBTL 17.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.87%)
PPL 229.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.78 (-1.62%)
PRL 34.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.57%)
PTC 67.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.24%)
SEARL 90.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.13%)
SSGC 26.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.29%)
TELE 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.30 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (6.16%)
TREET 24.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.37%)
TRG 71.90 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.21%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday sought reply from the home department and inspector general of prisons by May 15 on a petition of wife of Moazam Ali, who is convicted for the murder of MQM’s leader Imran Farooq, challenging the shifting of her husband from Adiala to Sahiwal Jail.

A trial court of Islamabad had awarded life imprisonment to Moazam Ali in 2020 on the charges of facilitating the killers of Imran Farooq in London. The petitioner, Sadia Bano, through her counsel, Mian Dawood, argued that the shifting of the petitioner’s husband was in violation of Pakistan Prison Rules 1978.

He said the petitioner’s husband was kept at Adiala Jail during the trial and his wife and children shifted to Islamabad from Karachi to contest the case. He argued that the shifting of a prisoner far from the residence of his family or hometown was against the rules.

He said the petitioner and her children could not afford a day-long travel from Islamabad to Sahiwal to visit the prisoner fortnightly.

The counsel pointed out that the petitioner filed an application to the home department and the inspector general of the prisons against the shifting of her husband from one jail to another but no action had been taken by the respondents.

He asked the court to set aside the transfer of the petitioner’s husband from Adiala jail to Sahiwal jail.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.