BR100 Decreased By (-0.47%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.64%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.37%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.37%)
AGHA 6.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
BECO 4.38 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.69%)
BML 55.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.84%)
BOP 29.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.43%)
CNERGY 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.39%)
CSIL 5.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.32%)
FCCL 51.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.87%)
FFL 14.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.52%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
KOSM 5.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.71%)
LOTCHEM 26.35 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.69%)
MLCF 88.87 Decreased By ▼ -2.36 (-2.59%)
NBP 162.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-1.03%)
NCPL 52.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1%)
NPL 58.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-0.96%)
OGDC 313.50 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.04%)
PACE 9.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.61%)
PAEL 35.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.62%)
PIBTL 14.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.63%)
PPL 219.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.86 (-0.84%)
PRL 91.45 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.25%)
PTC 59.26 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.12%)
SSGC 23.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.86%)
TBL 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.46%)
TELE 7.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.92%)
TPL 21.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.59%)
TPLP 12.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.27%)
TREET 21.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.14%)
TRG 55.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.86%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday sought reply from the home department and inspector general of prisons by May 15 on a petition of wife of Moazam Ali, who is convicted for the murder of MQM’s leader Imran Farooq, challenging the shifting of her husband from Adiala to Sahiwal Jail.

A trial court of Islamabad had awarded life imprisonment to Moazam Ali in 2020 on the charges of facilitating the killers of Imran Farooq in London. The petitioner, Sadia Bano, through her counsel, Mian Dawood, argued that the shifting of the petitioner’s husband was in violation of Pakistan Prison Rules 1978.

He said the petitioner’s husband was kept at Adiala Jail during the trial and his wife and children shifted to Islamabad from Karachi to contest the case. He argued that the shifting of a prisoner far from the residence of his family or hometown was against the rules.

He said the petitioner and her children could not afford a day-long travel from Islamabad to Sahiwal to visit the prisoner fortnightly.

The counsel pointed out that the petitioner filed an application to the home department and the inspector general of the prisons against the shifting of her husband from one jail to another but no action had been taken by the respondents.

He asked the court to set aside the transfer of the petitioner’s husband from Adiala jail to Sahiwal jail.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.