AIRLINK 71.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.13%)
BOP 5.04 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.8%)
CNERGY 4.39 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 28.70 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.53%)
DGKC 83.00 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.73%)
FCCL 21.95 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 33.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.08%)
FFL 10.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.69%)
GGL 10.46 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.36%)
HBL 112.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.42%)
HUBC 140.80 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.21%)
HUMNL 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (4.98%)
KEL 4.61 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (5.25%)
KOSM 4.57 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.56%)
MLCF 38.12 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.29%)
OGDC 133.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-0.77%)
PAEL 26.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.35%)
PIAA 24.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.61%)
PIBTL 6.60 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.76%)
PPL 123.30 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (1.11%)
PRL 27.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.07%)
PTC 13.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.72%)
SEARL 55.63 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (1.35%)
SNGP 70.60 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.29%)
SSGC 10.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.59%)
TPLP 11.10 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.37%)
TRG 62.00 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (1.81%)
UNITY 25.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.12%)
WTL 1.33 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.91%)
BR100 7,637 Decreased By -0.9 (-0.01%)
BR30 25,053 Increased By 81.3 (0.33%)
KSE100 72,907 Increased By 146.2 (0.2%)
KSE30 23,607 Decreased By -18.5 (-0.08%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has set aside the notifications issued for delimitations made by the delimitation committees/officers for local bodies elections in different constituencies of Punjab and referred a number of petitions to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for their disposal within one month in accordance with the law.

The petitioner Tariq Iqbal and others approached the court against the decision of the delimitation committees/authorities regarding delimitation of different constituencies in Punjab.

The court said one of the fundamental steps to hold fair elections is that the process of delimitation of constituencies should be carried out by a neutral and credible body, the court added.

The court observed that the delimitation authority while conducting the impugned delimitation have failed to act reasonably, fairly and justly as required under section 24-A of General Clauses Act.

It was incumbent upon the authority to decide the objections of each objector separately on its own merit, but to its dismay it decided multifarious objections raised by petitioners evasively in a single order. Such an order is not sustainable under the law, the court held.

The court said although the authority decided the objections but they are not in accordance with the Rule. No justification or reasoning has been mentioned in the impugned order of delimitation authority. It is not a speaking order rather based on evasive grounds, the court added.

The court said the impugned order as well as the proceedings are also a gross violation of section 24-A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which manifestly impresses upon the authorities to decide the cases after application of mind on the touchstone of reasonableness, which otherwise is lacking in the instant case.

The court allowing the petitions observed that the ECP under provisions of the Act, rules and the constitution has the mandate to make amendments, alteration or modification in the final list of constituencies, so the remedy against the decision of the authority provided under Section 22 of the Act can be deemed to be the ECP and referred all the petitions to ECP for their disposal in accordance with the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.