BR100 Decreased By (-0.73%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.77%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.49%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.47%)
BECO 5.77 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (8.66%)
BML 53.00 Increased By ▲ 1.42 (2.75%)
BOP 33.99 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.09%)
CNERGY 8.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.41%)
DCL 12.20 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (3.39%)
FCCL 52.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.32%)
FCSC 5.07 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.42%)
FFL 17.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.1%)
FNEL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.27%)
HUMNL 10.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.09%)
KEL 8.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.47%)
KOSM 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 86.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.37 (-1.56%)
NBP 185.16 Decreased By ▼ -2.53 (-1.35%)
PACE 10.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.13%)
PAEL 39.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.62%)
PIAHCLA 26.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.02%)
PIBTL 16.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
PPL 228.18 Decreased By ▼ -2.19 (-0.95%)
PRL 34.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 65.33 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (1.27%)
SEARL 90.13 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.28%)
SSGC 26.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.37%)
TELE 8.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.08%)
THCCL 58.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-0.98%)
TPLP 8.22 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
TREET 24.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.88%)
TRG 69.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-1.3%)
WAVES 9.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.7%)
WTL 1.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)

KARACHI: Karachi Customs Agents Association (KCAA) has requested the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to defer the effective date of SRO 567(1)/2022 until July 1, 2022, and review the slab of subject penalties in the upcoming budget.

In a letter sent to the chairman of FBR, the KCAA said that they had received numerous queries regarding its mechanism to ensure its true implementation under the Custom Rules 2001 and the Customs Act 1969.

It said that the traders and their agents are presently not allowed to be present at the time of de-sealing of the containers during the examination and only the custodian is performing the process of de-sealing which can increase the probability of negligence on the part of the custodian while reporting the presence of import documents accompanied with the consignment. On the other hand, the trader may suffer a heavy amount of penalty due to the inadvertence while reporting.

The letter also pointed out that the pre-defined slabs of penalties mentioned under clauses (ii) & (iii) of S. No. 1 of section 156 of the Customs Act, 1969 is inconsistent when compared to the pattern of penalties mentioned in other clauses of the said section.

Furthermore, it highlighted that only the maximum limit of the penalty is notified for the purpose of penalisation as can be seen in clause (i) of 1 or (i) of 3 or clause (i) of 5 of Section 156 which is imposed under circumstantial discretion whereas under clause (ii) & (iii) of S. No. 1 of section 156 slabs with a definite amount of penalty are given with the highest amount being carried onwards for every recurring violation. Therefore, it is proposed that a single maximum amount of penalty may be defined for imposition against the violation of rules 389 & 433(A) under clauses (ii) & (iii) of S. No 1 of Section 156 of the Customs Act, 1969 instead of different slabs of a fixed amount.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.