BR100 Increased By (0.11%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.26%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.12%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.09%)
AGHA 7.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.52%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 57.26 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-2.39%)
BOP 34.10 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.22%)
CNERGY 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-6.5%)
CSIL 5.35 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.94%)
FCCL 54.61 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.62%)
FFL 16.70 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.46%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.64%)
KEL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.92%)
KOSM 5.75 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.95%)
LOTCHEM 29.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.01%)
MLCF 94.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-2.09%)
NBP 202.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.41%)
NCPL 57.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.26%)
NPL 67.78 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.7%)
OGDC 316.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.57%)
PACE 10.64 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
PAEL 43.15 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (3.3%)
PIBTL 16.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
PPL 220.50 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.15%)
PRL 49.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 70.98 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.39%)
SSGC 28.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-3.33%)
TBL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.33%)
TELE 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
TPL 18.14 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (5.65%)
TPLP 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (7.11%)
TREET 22.75 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.71%)
TRG 60.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.13%)
By

BRUSSELS/LONDON: Proposals from southern European countries to intervene in energy markets have highlighted the difficulty facing an EU summit this week as it seeks to respond to record prices driven by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The 27 EU-member states are responsible for their own national energy policies. That complicates the European Commission’s task of devising a plan as it balances the goals of cutting reliance on Russian energy, limiting economic pain and not losing sight of its ambitions to cut carbon emissions.

Following a first batch of proposals in October - when prices were already surging - focused on national subsidies and tax cuts, the EU executive is drafting further options to present to leaders at a Brussels summit on March 24-25.

They are expected to contain steps countries can implement on a national basis when coordinated intervention has divided opinion.

Opponents of EU-wide intervention to cap gas prices say it would use public funding to effectively subsidise fossil fuel generation. That money, they say, should be spent on the shift to clean energy.

Supporters say that without it, some member states will struggle to fund measures domestically to shield poorer households if high energy prices persist. EU governments have already ploughed billions into tax cuts and subsidies to protect consumers.

Portugal and Spain last week said they had drawn up proposals to impose a 180 euros per megawatt hour (MWh) price cap in Europe’s wholesale electricity spot market, and would push ahead with the plan even without EU backing.

But a Spanish Energy Ministry source said on Monday the cap was not the country’s core proposal and Spain would prefer measures that have broader EU support.

“Right now it is not the main option on the table,” the source said. “The main one is to decouple the price of gas from the price of electricity.”

Some countries have already imposed price caps, with France freezing domestic gas prices last year by compensating gas companies for selling below higher spot prices. Greece has separately proposed a cap on European gas prices, the main driver of high electricity costs.

Those opposed to intervening in energy markets and the proposed price caps include Germany and the Netherlands.

“We are very reluctant to intervene in markets, because we want to avoid disrupting markets in the short term as that could hinder investments in sustainable energy,” Dutch climate minister Rob Jetten said on Thursday.

Leonhard Birnbaum, chief executive of Germany’s biggest energy company E.ON, last week also said there was a risk that artificially capping prices would mask the scarcity signals that encourage producers to ramp up energy generation when demand is high.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.