BR100 Increased By (1.77%)
BR30 Increased By (1.96%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.59%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.65%)
BECO 5.62 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.72%)
BML 59.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-2.79%)
BOP 34.61 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (2.76%)
CNERGY 8.08 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 12.05 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (3.52%)
FCCL 54.40 Increased By ▲ 2.26 (4.33%)
FCSC 5.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.95%)
FFL 18.05 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.22%)
FNEL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.48%)
HUMNL 11.07 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.27%)
KEL 8.05 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.68%)
KOSM 5.88 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.62%)
MLCF 90.52 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (4.64%)
NBP 190.17 Increased By ▲ 5.87 (3.19%)
PACE 11.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.03%)
PAEL 41.07 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (2.78%)
PIAHCLA 25.84 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.66%)
PIBTL 17.51 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.39%)
PPL 225.84 Increased By ▲ 3.17 (1.42%)
PRL 34.63 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.49%)
PTC 64.62 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.38%)
SEARL 91.38 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.02%)
SSGC 26.97 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.12%)
TELE 8.93 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.22%)
THCCL 69.16 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.01%)
TPLP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.68%)
TREET 24.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.24%)
TRG 69.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.15%)
WAVES 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.45%)
WTL 1.27 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
By

VIENNA: Talks to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal on Friday faced the threat of collapse after a last-minute Russian demand forced world powers to pause negotiations for an undetermined time despite having a largely completed text.

Eleven months of talks to restore the deal which lifted sanctions on Iran in return for curbs on its nuclear programme have reached their final stages.

But last Saturday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov unexpectedly demanded sweeping guarantees that Russian trade with Iran would not be affected by sanctions imposed on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine - a demand Western powers say is unacceptable and Washington has insisted it will not agree to.

“A pause in #ViennaTalks is needed, due to external factors,” European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell wrote on Twitter. “A final text is essentially ready and on the table.”

Tehran on Thursday suggested there were new obstacles to reviving the deal. Washington underlined that it had no intention of accommodating Russia’s demands, which it has said have nothing to do with the Iran talks.

A week ago preparations were being made in Vienna for a weekend meeting to conclude an agreement bringing Iran back into compliance with the deal’s restrictions on its rapidly advancing nuclear activities and bringing the United States back into the accord it left in 2018 by re-imposing sanctions on Tehran.

Officials said they were hoping the talks would resume in the next days. A senior EU official said there were still two or three technical issues that needed to be resolved between Washington and Tehran, but those could be resolved quickly.

He said he hoped they would return to Vienna before the Iranian New Year on March 21.

The official said the talks had to be paused to get a response from Moscow after it was told that its demands, which went beyond its nuclear commitments, could not be met.

“They are thinking about that reaction and in the meantime we cannot advance in the sense that we cannot finalise the negotiation,” the official said.

“It (Russia) has said it will respond in a question of days.”

NEGOTIATING

FOOTNOTES

Russia’s envoy to the talks, Mikhail Ulyanov, dismissed suggestions that Moscow was the reason the talks had stalled.

“The conclusion of the deal does not depend on Russia only,” he told reporters after meeting EU coordinator Enrique Mora. “There are other actors who need additional time and who have additional concerns, and they are being discussed.”

Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Saeed Khatibzadeh said a pause in talks may create momentum for resolving any outstanding issues, but he insisted that external factors would not affect the will to move ahead with a collective agreement.

Appearing to back Moscow, China’s envoy Wang Qun said negotiations couldn’t be conducted under a “political vacuum” and that all sides’ demands needed to be considered.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.