AIRLINK 75.50 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.87%)
BOP 4.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 4.53 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.89%)
DFML 41.90 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (4.75%)
DGKC 87.20 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (0.98%)
FCCL 21.52 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.75%)
FFBL 33.95 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.3%)
FFL 9.81 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.93%)
GGL 10.59 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.34%)
HBL 113.26 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (0.46%)
HUBC 138.21 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.56%)
HUMNL 11.49 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.61%)
KEL 5.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.57%)
KOSM 4.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
MLCF 38.00 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.53%)
OGDC 140.00 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.36%)
PAEL 25.65 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.16%)
PIAA 21.36 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (3.29%)
PIBTL 6.92 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.76%)
PPL 124.52 Increased By ▲ 2.32 (1.9%)
PRL 26.78 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.75%)
PTC 14.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.36%)
SEARL 59.24 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.44%)
SNGP 69.00 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.07%)
SSGC 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.97%)
TELE 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.24%)
TPLP 11.27 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.9%)
TRG 64.56 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.58%)
UNITY 26.65 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.38%)
WTL 1.53 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.52%)
BR100 7,891 Increased By 53.4 (0.68%)
BR30 25,656 Increased By 204.5 (0.8%)
KSE100 75,433 Increased By 318.6 (0.42%)
KSE30 24,254 Increased By 139.7 (0.58%)

WASHINGTON: US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin ordered Pentagon officials Thursday to undertake reforms to reduce the number of civilian deaths from military strikes after multiple unjustified fatal incidents.

"The protection of civilians is fundamentally consistent with the effective, efficient and decisive use of force in pursuit of US national interests," Austin said in a directive issued to Department of Defence leadership.

"It is a strategic and moral imperative," he said.

Austin gave Pentagon officials 90 days to produce a plan for how civilian casualties can be reduced and avoided in combat operations, saying the experiences in Afghanistan and Iraq provide an opportunity to learn lessons and mitigate civilian harm in an institutional way.

The move came after several incidents placed a dark cloud over the Pentagon, most recently the erroneous killing of 10 people, including seven children, in a Kabul drone strike in August 2021 during the last days of the US presence in Afghanistan.

Biden says administration mulling re-designating Yemen's Houthis a terrorist group

Likewise, the US military has been embarrassed by reporting by The New York Times that showed a poorly managed March 2019 bombing that killed some 70 civilians in the final days of the war against the Islamic State group.

The military avoided investigation and accountability in that incident, the Times said.

Austin's order came after a study of civilian death causes and reporting by RAND Corp, commissioned by the Pentagon, painted an unflattering picture of the US military's processes for dealing with such incidents.

It said that in planning strikes, the military focuses so much on the enemy that it neglects the broader civilian picture -- a problem that can lead to avoidable casualties.

And it says the military does not adequately and consistently investigate and record civilian death incidents, and does not have a central database that would permit study that could lead to solutions.

Investigations "are rarely done," said Michael McNerney, one of the Rand report's authors.

Furthermore, the data management on incidents, he said, were a "hot mess."

Rand recommended the Pentagon establish a "center of excellence" with personnel dedicated full time to civilian harm issues and strengthen data collection and analysis.

Rand also called for a review of how the military offers condolence of "ex gratia" payments to the families of those non-combatants killed as a result of US attacks.

McNerney said that payments are inconsistent, with some field commanders offering them and others not, and they had been used frequently for civilian deaths in Afghanistan but rarely in Iraq.

The Department of Defence "really needs to explain the purpose of these payments more clearly," he said.

"Are they only relevant to help US ground forces and support a commander on the ground, as some in Afghanistan used it for?" he asked.

"Or should the US use these payments as an acknowledgement of harm and as an accountability tool, because it's the right thing to do?"

Comments

Comments are closed.