BR100 Decreased By (-0.95%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.96%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.81%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.92%)
AGHA 7.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.41%)
BECO 5.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.34%)
BML 57.80 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.52%)
BOP 33.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.56%)
CNERGY 9.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
FCCL 53.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.30 (-2.38%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
FNEL 1.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.81%)
KEL 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.03%)
KOSM 5.84 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.21%)
LOTCHEM 29.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.75%)
MLCF 91.70 Decreased By ▼ -2.66 (-2.82%)
NBP 201.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.85 (-0.91%)
NCPL 56.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.53%)
NPL 66.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.33%)
OGDC 314.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.39%)
PACE 10.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.75%)
PAEL 41.88 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-3.06%)
PIBTL 16.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.03%)
PPL 217.91 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-0.85%)
PRL 50.60 Increased By ▲ 1.41 (2.87%)
PTC 69.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.39%)
SSGC 27.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-4.42%)
TBL 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.81%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.48%)
TPL 18.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.77%)
TPLP 13.39 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.9%)
TREET 22.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.1%)
TRG 59.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.62%)
Opinion Print edition: 2021-09-16

KE’s BQPS-III project — I

Published Updated

The front page coverage of subject project (BR, Sept 10) is both timely and perhaps “good news:” for Karachiites; though technical information is missing, covering the information relating to efficiency (cost of produced power) and how it will impact the environment, specially covering addition of oxides of carbon and nitrogen! If all available technologies are not included in the power plant design, then this power plant is also a part of the problem and definitely not a solution! How is it that the environmental-friendly government is working so hard in adding trees for “de-carbonization” and then “approve and appreciate” inefficient thermal power plants which will nullify all the good work done to reduce the serious impacts of “climate change”.

“Efficient” combined cycle power plants lose efficiency and power when they are operated under “normal” high temperatures prevailing in Karachi for most of the time except for 2-3 weeks in “winter” conditions. How can one accept such degradations for most of the time, when technologies are available to operate the combined cycle power plant at full power and efficiency all year round?

(To be continued)

Engr. Ainul Abedin (Karachi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.