BR100 Decreased By (-0.6%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.91%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.54%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.53%)
AGHA 6.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.05%)
BECO 4.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BML 55.11 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-1.89%)
BOP 29.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.56%)
CNERGY 12.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.39%)
CSIL 5.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.56%)
FCCL 51.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.06%)
FFL 14.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.04%)
FNEL 1.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.66%)
KOSM 5.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.25%)
LOTCHEM 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
MLCF 88.86 Decreased By ▼ -2.37 (-2.6%)
NBP 162.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.71 (-1.04%)
NCPL 52.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-1.65%)
NPL 58.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.66%)
OGDC 312.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.25%)
PACE 9.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.02%)
PAEL 34.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.85%)
PIBTL 14.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.11%)
PPL 218.90 Decreased By ▼ -2.46 (-1.11%)
PRL 91.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.03%)
PTC 59.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.29%)
SSGC 22.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.63%)
TBL 8.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.49%)
TELE 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.37%)
TPL 21.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-2.63%)
TPLP 12.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-4.46%)
TREET 21.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.14%)
TRG 55.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.54%)
Opinion Print edition: 2021-09-16

KE’s BQPS-III project — I

Published Updated

The front page coverage of subject project (BR, Sept 10) is both timely and perhaps “good news:” for Karachiites; though technical information is missing, covering the information relating to efficiency (cost of produced power) and how it will impact the environment, specially covering addition of oxides of carbon and nitrogen! If all available technologies are not included in the power plant design, then this power plant is also a part of the problem and definitely not a solution! How is it that the environmental-friendly government is working so hard in adding trees for “de-carbonization” and then “approve and appreciate” inefficient thermal power plants which will nullify all the good work done to reduce the serious impacts of “climate change”.

“Efficient” combined cycle power plants lose efficiency and power when they are operated under “normal” high temperatures prevailing in Karachi for most of the time except for 2-3 weeks in “winter” conditions. How can one accept such degradations for most of the time, when technologies are available to operate the combined cycle power plant at full power and efficiency all year round?

(To be continued)

Engr. Ainul Abedin (Karachi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.